|
|
#41
11-10-2005, 08:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not commenting on the quality of play by either. I'm not gonna even pretend to know whats going on here, what with there recent history. I'm just commenting that every time I see these two, KKF is owning. Also, why aren't you playing? [/ QUOTE ] 1) I work during the day. 2) I do not like playing online for those stakes in games that aggro. 
|
|
#43
11-10-2005, 08:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
avoidable?
---------------------------------------------------------------- Hand #9173942-23593 at Bhipak (No Limit Hold'em) Powered by UltimateBet Started at 10/Nov/05 19:01:30 SheFaLLs is at seat 0 with $10897. KaneKungFu123 is at seat 1 with $16826.50. MrBallbreaker is at seat 3 with $18261.50. nojja is at seat 4 with $14485. limit_man is at seat 5 with $5000. ice breaker is at seat 6 with $10000. Mahatma is at seat 7 with $10747. robopok is at seat 8 with $2050. Chaazz is at seat 9 with $11326. The button is at seat 3. nojja posts the small blind of $50. limit_man posts the big blind of $100. SheFaLLs: -- -- KaneKungFu123: 6d 7d MrBallbreaker: -- -- nojja: -- -- limit_man: -- -- Mahatma: -- -- robopok: -- -- Chaazz: -- -- Pre-flop: Mahatma calls. robopok folds. Chaazz calls. SheFaLLs folds. KaneKungFu123 calls. MrBallbreaker raises to $650. nojja folds. limit_man folds. Mahatma folds. Chaazz folds. KaneKungFu123 calls. Flop (board: 5h 8c 9h): KaneKungFu123 bets $1650. MrBallbreaker calls. Turn (board: 5h 8c 9h Kh): KaneKungFu123 bets $4950. MrBallbreaker goes all-in for $15961.50. KaneKungFu123 goes all-in for $14526.50. MrBallbreaker is returned $1435 (uncalled). River (board: 5h 8c 9h Kh Ks): (no action in this round) Showdown: MrBallbreaker shows Jh Ah. MrBallbreaker has Jh Ah 5h 9h Kh: flush, ace high. KaneKungFu123 shows 6d 7d. KaneKungFu123 has 6d 7d 5h 8c 9h: straight, nine high. Hand #9173942-23593 Summary: $3 is raked from a pot of $34003. MrBallbreaker wins $34000 with flush, ace high. ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
#46
11-10-2005, 08:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
[ QUOTE ]
whats your +/- on the night vs Mahat? [/ QUOTE ] not sure, 30-40K.
|
|
#47
11-10-2005, 08:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
I don't think I've ever seen you post so many non-sarcastic replies in one thread. Are you OK?
|
|
#48
11-10-2005, 08:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
[ QUOTE ]
I'm just commenting that every time I see these two, KKF is owning. [/ QUOTE ] My response had little to do with KKF or Mahatma. It had more to do with the fact that ascertaining relative skill levels based on a few hands from a single session is ridiculous. Not saying that's what you're doing, but that's the way it seems a lot of people take many of these threads. However, I could show you a set of hands that makes just about every regular player in these games look super-live. In some cases, it's because they are indeed live. In other cases, they just got in some bad spots or made a bad read. Had you watched me play last week, you would have thought I was the best 25/50 player around, stacking everyone in his path. Had you watched me play this week, you would have seen me get stacked left and right.
|
|
#49
11-10-2005, 08:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
Yeah I definetely am getting a little tired of hearing people make large scale judgements of skill based on a very narrow sample. I thought I qualified my statement well enough, guess not. I am not part of the crowd that you are refering to. I just find it entertaining that EVERY time I've watched this game, KKF has been the dominant force, but I'm allowing that there is probably many times (as I'm sure KKF would admit to) that he did stupid stuff of just plain lost a lot of money.
|
|
#50
11-10-2005, 08:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm just commenting that every time I see these two, KKF is owning. [/ QUOTE ] My response had little to do with KKF or Mahatma. It had more to do with the fact that ascertaining relative skill levels based on a few hands from a single session is ridiculous. Not saying that's what you're doing, but that's the way it seems a lot of people take many of these threads. However, I could show you a set of hands that makes just about every regular player in these games look super-live. In some cases, it's because they are indeed live. In other cases, they just got in some bad spots or made a bad read. Had you watched me play last week, you would have thought I was the best 25/50 player around, stacking everyone in his path. Had you watched me play this week, you would have seen me get stacked left and right. [/ QUOTE ] This is true for everyone at all stakes. And many times when you fuk up bluffs and go back to look at them, in retrospect your opponent's hand seems transparent. But you feel stupid when you realize this and the table views you as stupid, but everyone is just being results oriented. I mean, the "you" here prolly refers to me, but i figure it must be true for lots of players.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
