#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hand in the cookie jar
I don't see many posts about stone cold bluffs, but I attempt them occasionally and get away with them more often than I deserve to.
The read on this table is loose, but a bit skittish. Unraised flops get a lot of callers. A preflop raise often results in a ghost town. This was my last orbit at this table. Party Poker 0.50/1 Hold'em (10 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is MP3 with 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls, <font color="666666">2 folds</font>, Hero calls, <font color="666666">2 folds</font>, SB completes, BB checks, Flop: (6 SB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(6 players)</font> SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, UTG+2 checks, Hero checks. Looks like it missed everybody. If I can pair up on the turn, I think I'm going to take down this pot. Turn: (3 BB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(6 players)</font> SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, UTG+2 checks, Hero checks. Anyone slowplaying a 3? If so, there's not much time left to get your payoff. River: (3 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(6 players)</font> SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, UTG+2 checks, <font color="CC3333">Hero ???</font> Here comes the scare card. The river is the highest card out there, it's a spade, it checks to me. There's no way my 7 high is going to win this pot, so I have a 100% chance of winning $0 if I check. If I can bet and drag the pot one time in 4, I break even. But there are 5 players I'd have to fold out, and there may be some low pairs out there that will make a crying call, especially considering I'm last to act and my actions are suspect. Do I win this 1 time in 4? Or am I going to end up having a 100% of winning -$1 instead of $0? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand in the cookie jar
3BB. Six opponents. You have 7 high. I'm thinking this is -EV.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand in the cookie jar
Hey tardigrade,
If I were going to bluff at this pot, I would do it on the turn. I think the 3 pairing up is a huge scarecard for a lot of party players. -Jaran |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand in the cookie jar
Unlike many of these boards, where there could be 3 or 4 low pairs, I think I can rule out trip threes, pair of jacks, a flush, a pair of nines. The only two playable hands left are a pair of twos and ace high. I should calc the odds and see how many are likely to be out there in a field of 6, then it would be a matter of estimating how often they call. As it was, there was only one player who thought for a few seconds before folding. I was hopeful, but still surprised to see it happen. Perhaps she thought it was unlikely anyone would attempt a bluff into a field that big.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand in the cookie jar
This is a definitely a -EV play. You would have to fold everyone out 1 in 2.5 times just to show a slight +EV.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand in the cookie jar
I believe it's one in 4 (or 3.5 to show a decent win margin) ... If I lose three in a row, I'm down $3, and if the 4th is a win, then I'm even again.
(EDIT: Another way to think of it is that when I bet, it's now a 4BB pot that I win when successful.) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand in the cookie jar
What mistake do Party opponents make more often: folding when they should call, or calling when they should fold?
No way a bluff here is +EV. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand in the cookie jar
This is a bluff that will LOOK like a bluff to most party players. They'll call you with anything. Or with nothing. Either way they'll call you a high percentage of the time. Don't get fancy in small pots. Bet when you got it, fold when you don't.
|
|
|