Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-19-2003, 11:55 AM
TJSWAN TJSWAN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 169
Default Pocket Sixes N/M

Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-19-2003, 02:30 PM
JTG51 JTG51 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 3,746
Default Re: C\'MON GUYS!!!

Let me add a hint and say that it would be almost impossible for him to hold the hand he held...

I have a game for you. I'm thinking of a number. Try to guess it. I'll give you a hint, it's between 1 and 1000. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Seriously, do we get an answer here?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-19-2003, 03:24 PM
BookOfIcculus BookOfIcculus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 345
Default How do you keep a 2+2er in suspence.

Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-19-2003, 03:56 PM
biggambler biggambler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Western N.Y.
Posts: 206
Default 6 -7 suited? EOM

Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-19-2003, 05:06 PM
2005 2005 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 134
Default 8/5 nm

Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-19-2003, 05:35 PM
marbles marbles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wauwatosa, WI
Posts: 568
Default Re: Guess my opponent\'s hand

Since you've already shot down the obvious 76s, the only thing that seems to make sense is a PP between 99 and JJ. And even that doesn't make a ton of sense.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-19-2003, 05:52 PM
hamster hamster is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 2
Default Anthropic principle

If he can't believe it, then I'm guessing it was something truly ridiculous like 24s or 47o. I'd guess 24s.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-19-2003, 05:58 PM
Scottnyce Scottnyce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 215
Default Re: Anthropic principle

89s?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-19-2003, 09:32 PM
mike l. mike l. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: oceanside, california
Posts: 2,212
Default did anyone say 64? that\'s my guess. n/m

Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-20-2003, 06:58 AM
brad brad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,803
Default Re: 22 nm

.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.