Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 10-11-2005, 06:03 PM
2+2 wannabe 2+2 wannabe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: getting pwned in challenge
Posts: 1,384
Default Re: A theoretical baseball question

[ QUOTE ]
.500 and 100 hrs is ridiculous, you wouldn't see numbers like that off a pitching machine set to the speed of the batter's liking.


[/ QUOTE ]

This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen on these boards
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 10-11-2005, 07:01 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A theoretical baseball question

[ QUOTE ]
All I know is that you would see a lot more knuckleball pitchers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Smart comment. Well appreciated by a baseball enthusiast such as myself.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 10-11-2005, 07:10 PM
bravos1 bravos1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In too deep
Posts: 323
Default Re: A theoretical baseball question

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
All I know is that you would see a lot more knuckleball pitchers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Smart comment. Well appreciated by a baseball enthusiast such as myself.

[/ QUOTE ]

True.. knuckleballers would get more looks... I already spoke about Wakefield in a previous post in this thread talking about how this would have little impact on his pitching numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 10-11-2005, 11:54 PM
DougOzzzz DougOzzzz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 132
Default Re: A theoretical baseball question

[ QUOTE ]

But look at some others in the same situation...

David Dellucci - .376
Coco Crisp - .374
Jason Ellison - .372
Raul Ibanez - .371
Garrett Atkins - .365
Emil Brown - .359


[/ QUOTE ]

You do realize that without the possibility of a strikeout on a pitch, batting averages are going to be pretty high anyway, right?
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 10-12-2005, 12:05 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A theoretical baseball question

I would like to submit "exhibit A".

Does anyone remember the NLCS in 1989, Giants v. Cubs?

Will Clark read a pitchers lips (He was equipped with 20/12 vision...yes, 20/12), and they had a conference on the mound before he came up to bat. He watched intently as the coach talked to the pitcher.

First pitch was a low and in fastball that he crushed for a 2 run homer. Later after the game he admitted that he read the lips of the coach who told the pitcher to feed him a low and in fastball on the first pitch, assuming Clark wouldn't expect it. (Low and in fastballs to lefty's are usually the danger zone, so they thought they could sneak an easy strike by him).

This is a case of Clark knowing what was coming, and crushing it for a homer.

Does anyone else remember this game? I know Cubs fans don't because they aren't knowledgable enough to remember that far back. They only thing they remember pre-Bartman was something about a Goat.. anyone else know what I'm talking about?
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 10-12-2005, 12:08 AM
Clarkmeister Clarkmeister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,247
Default Re: A theoretical baseball question

[ QUOTE ]

Does anyone else remember this game? I know Cubs fans don't because they aren't knowledgable enough to remember that far back. They only thing they remember pre-Bartman was something about a Goat.. anyone else know what I'm talking about?

[/ QUOTE ]

They remember Leon Durham.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.