Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-15-2005, 02:03 PM
drewjustdrew drewjustdrew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 230
Default Paul Phillips method

Let's try an incomplete information hand and see how it goes.

.50/1.00 blinds online.

One limper, cutoff raises to $4, I call from SB, BB calls.

Pot is $16.
Flop is Q,J,6 rainbow
I bet $10, two folds, cutoff raises to $22, I reraise to $34, cutoff calls.
Turn is another J.
I bet $15 into $81 pot, cutoff raises all-in and has me covered. I have $45 left in my stack. What is my minimum calling requirement? ($156 pot) My read on the player is that he a good player. I.e., not wild or tricky.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-15-2005, 02:13 PM
j0wlev j0wlev is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: Paul Phillips method

QQ, JJ, QJ, 66.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-15-2005, 02:49 PM
mudbuddha mudbuddha is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 27
Default Re: Paul Phillips method

5:1 to make this call, i dont understand the turn bet but i dont know your cards..

AJ, KJ, with odds like this your range is pretty big. your pretty much commited with any piece of this

i would have to say i would call with alot larger range than j0wlev would call with .. just b/c pot odds.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-15-2005, 02:56 PM
Georgia Avenue Georgia Avenue is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hand for Hand/Meeting for worship
Posts: 149
Default Re: Paul Phillips method

Add AA or KK I think...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-15-2005, 03:05 PM
DoomSlice DoomSlice is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 582
Default Re: Paul Phillips method

You made a weak bet, which will encourage him to bluff, so your calling hand range has to expand to account for this.

I'd say any Queen (with a good kicker), any pair higher than a Queen, and of course any jack.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-15-2005, 03:16 PM
NickPoker NickPoker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 63
Default Re: Paul Phillips method

[ QUOTE ]
QQ, JJ, QJ, 66.

[/ QUOTE ]

It looks like you think the villain has at least ToP 2 on flop, based on that logic, why would you call with 6-6. If you are going to call with 66, why wouldn't you call with a Jack?

Villain range on flop is AQ, set, QJ. K10s, or 109s. I don't see a non tricky reasonable villain reraising with anything less than this. In fact, the likely hood of AQ,K10, or 109 is low.
Your weak bet on the turn may encourage him to go over the top with any of the holdings above, though it is much more likely he has Top2 or better (most likely holding is QJ). Without doing the math I still call with a J or better for rthis amount of money. The only thing I am really comfortable with is QQ, or QJ. With all that being said, I can't think of too many hands I would have played the way the hero did other than maybe QQ or QJ.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-15-2005, 03:17 PM
NickPoker NickPoker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 63
Default Re: Paul Phillips method

I agree with Georgia I would add AA, KK and AQ to my list based on pot odds (though I think they are beat a good portion of the time).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-15-2005, 03:26 PM
Cardinal991 Cardinal991 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 46
Default Re: Paul Phillips method

Isn't QJ trying to get as much money in the pot as possible? Is pushing the way to do this?

It looks like hero has 66, which I'd call with. Also QQ, JJ (bien sur!), and QJ. I think villain has AA, KK, or AQ.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-15-2005, 03:39 PM
rikz rikz is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: Paul Phillips method

At 5:1 pot odds, pretty much any hand you let yourself get this far with makes calling a no-brainer. I don't understand the $15 turn bet followed by just a call with such a short stack at that point. If you think you are good, get it all in on the turn when he raises the $15 bet. If $15 was a blocker/probe bet, then you got your answer and you should fold. Once you call the turn and get 5:1 odds, you should probably call the river with whatever you've got at that point.

So the question becomes, what would have been my minimum requirements to get myself into this situation? Answer: I'd be here, and calling, with QJs (maybe, see my comments below), 66, JJ, and QQ.

I would have reraised preflop with KK or AA in the SB. I would have folded AQ or AJ in the SB to CO's raise. I might have called with AK/JTs/KQs, but then I'd have folded those to the cutoff's raise after my weak leading turn bet. Any pocket pair that I called preflop and missed my set with I'd fold to cutoff's raise on the flop. I'd have folded preflop with anything else. Finally, even those big suited connectors are pretty weak out of position in a raised pot, especially if that pot ends up as a heads-up hand with the preflop raiser. So, I might very well have folded preflop with QJs/KQs/JTs etc. That would then leave only 66, JJ, and QQ as hands I'd be calling with by the river.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-15-2005, 03:45 PM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boring work = post too much
Posts: 2,435
Default Re: Paul Phillips method

You already screwed up the flop badly. But you should never fold this here unless you have no pair and not even a 3 out draw.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.