Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2005, 12:23 AM
nate_king1 nate_king1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Getting destoryed at the 11s.
Posts: 290
Default 33 vs. 55 Update?

Update on the quest over which is more profitable 30+3 or 50+5.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2005, 12:29 AM
Mr_J Mr_J is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 639
Default Re: 33 vs. 55 Update?

Which is more profitable?? I can't see how it's not the $55s. The skill level jump can't be large enough to make up for the much larger turnover. I think a better question would be how much more profitable they are. There is a reason why people move up (besides ego).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2005, 12:44 AM
bones bones is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 56
Default Re: 33 vs. 55 Update?

I think hes referring to the Irie/Zen prop.

And there's something to be said for learning to beat bigger games, even if the smaller game is slightly more profitable at the moment.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2005, 01:23 AM
citanul citanul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 64
Default Re: 33 vs. 55 Update?

come on, just PM one of the interested parties.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2005, 01:54 AM
Mr_J Mr_J is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 639
Default Re: 33 vs. 55 Update?

"I think hes referring to the Irie/Zen prop."

I'd guess Irie won (he ran hot at first, and he said zen ran cold at first).

"even if the smaller game is slightly more profitable at the moment."

I'll guess that the $55s will never be less profitable for a STRONG $33er. The $55s might be less profitable for a weaker/average $33er?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2005, 02:08 AM
nate_king1 nate_king1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Getting destoryed at the 11s.
Posts: 290
Default Re: 33 vs. 55 Update?

[ QUOTE ]
"I think hes referring to the Irie/Zen prop."

I'd guess Irie won (he ran hot at first, and he said zen ran cold at first).

"even if the smaller game is slightly more profitable at the moment."

I'll guess that the $55s will never be less profitable for a STRONG $33er. The $55s might be less profitable for a weaker/average $33er?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm wondering what kind of ROI Raptor or other pros has secured at the 55s compared to the 33s.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-17-2005, 02:13 AM
Irieguy Irieguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 340
Default Re: 33 vs. 55 Update?

[ QUOTE ]
I think hes referring to the Irie/Zen prop.

And there's something to be said for learning to beat bigger games, even if the smaller game is slightly more profitable at the moment.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's still going. We'll be done by the end of the month and post results. I'm winning right now, but Zen is way behind in volume at this point.

As far as profitability... it's very, very close. Otherwise, why would 2 players who've played thousands of SNGs at those levels wager on such a thing?

Irieguy
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2005, 02:14 AM
citanul citanul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 64
Default Re: 33 vs. 55 Update?

raptor, as well as many other "pros" have published their ROIs for various levels, including the 55s.

citanul
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-17-2005, 02:14 AM
citanul citanul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 64
Default Re: 33 vs. 55 Update?

[ QUOTE ]
Otherwise, why would 2 players who've played thousands of SNGs at those levels wager on such a thing?

[/ QUOTE ]

bahahhahaah. you're too funny.

citanul
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-17-2005, 02:26 AM
Mr_J Mr_J is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 639
Default Re: 33 vs. 55 Update?

"Otherwise, why would 2 players who've played thousands of SNGs at those levels wager on such a thing?"

Shorterm variance aside, because he has too much pride and you smell easy money??? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Sounds like you think it's close enough that maybe the $55s aren't worthwhile (besides maybe being conditioning for the $109s??)? I assume this opinion is before you consider rakeback?

A $33er has to hit 20% to equal an 11% ROI at the 55s. Now if he can hit at least 13%, then the move up is definately worthwhile (10%+ increase in hourly rate). Although it's not as profitable as adding another table [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.