Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-15-2005, 01:06 PM
grjr grjr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 82
Default Marginal Hand #4 Playing a passive table

I expect some good debate early on this one so don't let me down.

This is a typical Party evening lowest limit table filled with bad players who almost never raise preflop and go too far with their hands. No individual reads. What do you do?

Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (10 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. UTG+2 posts a blind of $0.5.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero ??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-15-2005, 01:13 PM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: Marginal Hand #4 Playing a passive table

Fold. It's close though. I'd limp one gappers, but for two gappers I need Q9s or better here. If you can expect it to be 7-handed for one bet you can limp, but I really want position with this hand.

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-15-2005, 01:14 PM
handsome handsome is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 616
Default Re: Marginal Hand #4 Playing a passive table

"No individual reads."
I stopped reading right there. This situation is only +EV if you can make a move or the players pay you off if you hit. With no reads, the likelihood of either is uncertain. So to me, no reads means no play.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-15-2005, 01:20 PM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: Marginal Hand #4 Playing a passive table

[ QUOTE ]
Fold. It's close though. I'd limp one gappers, but for two gappers I need Q9s or better here. If you can expect it to be 7-handed for one bet you can limp, but I really want position with this hand.
Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm a little tighter than this, but not much.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-15-2005, 01:25 PM
jrz1972 jrz1972 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 368
Default Re: Marginal Hand #4 Playing a passive table

Fold. I could be talked into playing this on the button with a bunch of bad limpers already in for one bet, but UTG+1 I am folding this.

Edit: Like Entity, I would limp with Q9s, so I suppose limping with J8s can't be a major leak. I still wouldn't do it though.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-15-2005, 01:31 PM
car ramrod car ramrod is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17
Default Re: Marginal Hand #4 Playing a passive table

Even bad players get hands, so with that position I would fold, if you get raised that would suck. Also you have to be sure you can get enough limpers to make a call good. Too many people play J10, QJ, etc. so you high card value is not there. If I were on the button after the limpers then I may call.
Calling is not terrible.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-15-2005, 01:31 PM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: Marginal Hand #4 Playing a passive table

[ QUOTE ]
I could be talked into playing this on the button with a bunch of bad limpers already in for one bet,

[/ QUOTE ]

It shouldn't take much convincing. I'm playing J7s and Q8s and lots of suited hands there, even if there aren't "lots" of limpers.

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-15-2005, 01:31 PM
grjr grjr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Marginal Hand #4 Playing a passive table

[ QUOTE ]
Fold. It's close though. I'd limp one gappers, but for two gappers I need Q9s or better here. If you can expect it to be 7-handed for one bet you can limp, but I really want position with this hand.

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

I meant to put earlier that the typical flop had 5-6 players and no preflop raise.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-15-2005, 01:35 PM
grjr grjr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Marginal Hand #4 Playing a passive table

Ok, here's a question for all the people who fold here (which is everybody I guess lol). Do you limp in with 22 on this table? 33? 44 55? Let me know.

Remember these are bad players. Not some 10/20 game somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-15-2005, 01:36 PM
@bsolute_luck @bsolute_luck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hi...I\'m in Delaware
Posts: 1,622
Default Re: Marginal Hand #4 Playing a passive table

[ QUOTE ]
I meant to put earlier that the typical flop had 5-6 players and no preflop raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

based on that info: i'd limp. i think it is an easy hand to get away from if things sour on the flop, but profitable with so many people calling with junk...too loose am i?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.