State of the Mod Discussion

[Jurollo]

hahaha.

[Jurollo]

Any idea on what the decision about who the 'forum suggesstions' mods will be, I see know harm in having something overmoderated, i.e. durron and myself in addition to bob. As I know I have talked to bob a lot in the past and wouldn't run into any problems with his decisions, as well as durron.
~Justin

[Mat Sklansky]

I don't see the need for a moderator in that section

[Jurollo]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't see the need for a moderator in that section

[/ QUOTE ]
Okey dokey, i was under the impression there would be, just trying to help.
~Justin

[xorbie]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
At present, yes. If there's demand for a split, it could happen in the (near) future.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's been talked about repeatedly in the forum. I'll PM AZK and Xorbie as I don't think they read this forum much.

I for one, though I moderate the Omaha forums, play a lot of mid-limit NL and would love to see a forum for 1/2 through 5/10 NL. The PL/NL forums suffer from the same problems as the limit forums if not worse.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think it's tricky where to draw the line. 5/10 plays more like 10/20 than 1/2, but if we group 5/10 and 10/20 together, we end up with just a "big games" forum which would have just about no posts. Maybe grouping 1/2-3/6 together in a seperate forum might help, and having the .5/1 games and lower be their own forum.

[durron597]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't see the need for a moderator in that section

[/ QUOTE ]

Because you will always have idiots posting crap? Especially in a forum suggestion section where people well be like "omg 2+2 sucks fix it".

[MrWookie47]

When I first read Mat's post, I changed my mind to agreeing with him in that he'd be plenty able to handle it alone, but durron makes a strong case. The signal to noise ratio in that forum may really suck. It might be good to have one other guy in there to delete/lock trolls/junk.

[Mat Sklansky]

We'll see what happens after it goes up.