|
|
|
|
#1
11-22-2005, 07:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
party > stars?
whats party like compared to stars, specifically in the 200-600 NL range? are they more crazy? more laggy?
im considering also opening an account there, from what i hear stars doesnt have many maniacs 
|
|
#4
11-22-2005, 11:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: party > stars?
I haven't played there much, so I can't speak from personal experience, but from what i've picked up Party has the softest games on the web. FWIW, muddywater (highstakes player, co-founder of CardRunners) says that UB 2/4 (or even 1/2) is harder than Party 5/10.
|
|
#5
11-22-2005, 11:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: party > stars?
I haven't played on Stars in months but it was pretty weak/tight when I did (1/2 full). Party's 6-max games at the 200-600 level are very soft and you can find a good game 24/7 (dunno if that's important to you). Getting rakeback is nice, too.
|
|
#6
11-22-2005, 12:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: party > stars?
[ QUOTE ]
you can find a good game 24/7 (dunno if that's important to you). [/ QUOTE ] very important .... i think ill play both for a while and see how it goes. i usually find my self playing in the 12-5am time and stars rarely has any good tables then. ive never tried rakeback at all. where do i start if im interested?
|
|
#7
11-22-2005, 12:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: party > stars?
Obviously Party>Stars. Due to Neteller issues, I'm currently stuck on Empire. But hopefully by the end of the week I will adding another fish to the Party Pond.
|
|
#8
11-22-2005, 12:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: party > stars?
[ QUOTE ]
Obviously Party>Stars. Due to Neteller issues, I'm currently stuck on Empire. But hopefully by the end of the week I will adding another fish to the Party Pond. [/ QUOTE ] i think im going to have my handle on party be TheWorstPlayer
|
|
#10
11-22-2005, 01:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: party > stars?
[ QUOTE ]
the 2/4 games on Full Tilt are greaaaat. [/ QUOTE ] quiet you
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
