Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Poker > Omaha/8
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-27-2005, 01:36 PM
dcasper70 dcasper70 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 127
Default Re: Wraparound draw LO8 .5/1

[ QUOTE ]
I probably would have mucked this pre-flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really?
I'd play it for 1 bet looking for a 2 or 3 hi card flop and play to scoop.

This is not that flop.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-27-2005, 04:10 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Wraparound draw LO8 .5/1

Preflop: Muck.
Flop: Muck.
Turn: Muck.
River: Muck.

I'll give explanation if needed, but preflop and the flop arent close at all, very standard laydowns.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-2005, 05:07 PM
dcasper70 dcasper70 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 127
Default Re: Wraparound draw LO8 .5/1

[ QUOTE ]
Preflop: Muck.
Flop: Muck.
Turn: Muck.
River: Muck.

I'll give explanation if needed, but preflop and the flop arent close at all, very standard laydowns.

[/ QUOTE ]

Flop, Turn and River, I think we all agree, but preflop???

Is this really a 'very standard laydown' preflop full ring?

I play 99% 6-max, so this is a genuine question. I'd like to hear your reasoning to see if it holds true at the shorthanded tables.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2005, 05:16 PM
kitaristi0 kitaristi0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Strawberry Fields
Posts: 109
Default Re: Wraparound draw LO8 .5/1

I call PF. Definitely not an instafold. A case can be made for both calling and folding.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-28-2005, 01:05 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Wraparound draw LO8 .5/1

[ QUOTE ]
Is this really a 'very standard laydown' preflop full ring?

I play 99% 6-max, so this is a genuine question. I'd like to hear your reasoning to see if it holds true at the shorthanded tables.

[/ QUOTE ]

IMO, playing LO8 with atleast 8 players at the table, your high hands need to ...

1.) Be strong already.
2.) Develop into the nuts
3.) Seen for one bet (results usually in good position)

With KJT9ds, not only is your hand not that strong to begin with, but you have very little chance of developing into the nuts. You can flop the low end of a straight, a J High or K high flush, or only two pair. You could get a good flop of 789, but even then your hand is extremley vunerable. If there is a flush on the board that is not yours, you have to dodge that, along with a pairing of the board. If a low card comes, that will also take 1/2 the pot away from you. (the same holds true when you catch a draw or a wrap draw, like the hand in question) There isnt one flop with this hand that I would feel comfortable with. (well maybe quads, but then your just a lucky fish)

Your position is decent, but there is also still a great possiblity of a raise or 2 raises behind you and having to put 2 or 3 bets in.

That's just my opinion, though. I could be wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-28-2005, 09:41 AM
chaos chaos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 370
Default Re: Wraparound draw LO8 .5/1

I would fold preflop. The 9 devalues your hand. If the 9 was a Q your hand might be worth a call. Being suited Jack-high does not add enough value to turn this hand into a call.

On the flop you have 13 out for a straight (four 6s, three 9s, three Ts, and three Js). Making your straight does not guarantee winning high. There are already three low cards out. You are only playing for half the pot. This is a clear fold.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.