Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Final Table WSOP
Call 247 61.60%
Fold 154 38.40%
Voters: 401. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:39 PM
TomHimself TomHimself is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 299
Default Re: barronvangortoth\'s spammish signature + lame poll

i think its spammy and lame
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:42 PM
chuddo chuddo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 20
Default Re: barronvangortoth\'s spammish signature + lame poll

because as mat mentioned to me and as i stated it would be remedied if a number of other posters found it inappropriate.

i figured this to be the best way versus derailing an actual strategy thread. (the threads i posted in originally were random liveatthebike threads)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:42 PM
Eurotrash Eurotrash is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 566
Default Re: barronvangortoth\'s spammish signature + lame poll

[ QUOTE ]
Fair enough, but I'm still curious why you didn't PM him and Mat and deal with it instead of coming here and making this idiot thread.

[/ QUOTE ]


Lexington Brian always enjoys a good public shaming/spectacle [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]


edit: i'm finding that sig you made up way funnier than i probably should, chuddo
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:44 PM
PoBoy321 PoBoy321 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 396
Default Re: barronvangortoth\'s spammish signature + lame poll

And if people take offense to it, let them contact Mat and complain, you don't need to start this poll, unless you, for some reason, have some personal grudge against BVT.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:44 PM
Blarg Blarg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,519
Default Re: barronvangortoth\'s spammish signature + lame poll

LOL I almost made a Lexington Brian remark too, but held back.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:49 PM
chuddo chuddo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 20
Default Re: barronvangortoth\'s spammish signature + lame poll

i have no personal grudge against him other than his spammy signature.

the fact i find his "on the edge" series of articles awful has no bearing on this stance.

i would feel the same way if it were someone such as el diabo, matt flynn, schneids, etc etc.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:49 PM
Homer Homer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,909
Default Re: barronvangortoth\'s spammish signature + lame poll

i did in two threads and barron did not address my posts at all. hence this thread and poll.

PM
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:51 PM
Homer Homer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,909
Default Re: barronvangortoth\'s spammish signature + lame poll

[ QUOTE ]
the fact i find his "on the edge" series of articles awful has no bearing on this stance.

[/ QUOTE ]

Love how you slipped that in there even though it was wholly unnecessary.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:57 PM
evil_twin evil_twin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 52
Default Re: barronvangortoth\'s spammish signature + lame poll

Signatures are pretty much universally lame. One can find reasons to have them in email (particularly for work), but on a message board? Seriously lame. I'm really surprised at the outcome of the poll. When I clicked "yes" I honestly expected to see an enourmous bar on the yes vote and virtually no no votes. Wow.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-12-2005, 04:04 PM
Blarg Blarg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,519
Default Re: barronvangortoth\'s spammish signature + lame poll

They're usually lame and you can usually pass over them too, by changing your preferences in the software.

The spammyness and lameness of the way Toth is doing it is because first, signatures are disabled in these forums, and second, he decided to make one anyway, and you can't avoid it.

The actual clutter it takes up is reasonably minimal, last I saw. I'm sure we've all seen signatures that were so huge that they were bigger than the the posts they were attached to. Even worse when they're incredibly stupid or dull. Toth's seem against the spirit of the forum rules, but basically inoffensive except for that.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.