Had the read but lost to 2 outer

KC50 · #1 04-10-2005, 02:00 PM

EP is pretty snug and villian is very loose passive. This only thing I believe I could've done different was re-raise preflop but based on the 2 players types I couldnt stand EP coming over my re-raise and didnt want to lose Villian. Villian would have called anyway which wouldve been fine.

All comments welcome.

$600 NL Hold'em - Sunday, April 10, 06:13:13 EDT 2005
>
>Table Table 37043 (Real Money)
>
>Seat 7 is the button
>
>Total number of players : 10
>
>Seat 1: DKGNBS ( $0 )
>
>Seat 2: hotmark777 ( $598.5 )
>
>Seat 3: xPHUKKEDUPx ( $1093.25 )
>
>Seat 4: anhbe1977 ( $561.8 )
>
>Seat 5: jonathanpbuf ( $208.7 )
>
>Seat 6: nbvcxz ( $932.5 )
>
>Seat 8: jonnyvegas82 ( $726 )
>
>Seat 9: wallus13 ( $455.1 )
>
>Seat 10: tasu123 ( $732.55 )
>
>Seat 7: ***HERO*** ( $591 )
>
>jonnyvegas82 posts small blind [$3].
>
>wallus13 posts big blind [$6].
>
>** Dealing down cards **
>
>Dealt to ***HERO*** [ Qs Qh ]
>
>tasu123 folds.
>
>hotmark777 raises [$27].
>
>xPHUKKEDUPx folds.
>
>anhbe1977 folds.
>
>jonathanpbuf folds.
>
>nbvcxz calls [$27].
>
>***HERO*** calls [$27].
>
>jonnyvegas82 folds.
>
>wallus13 folds.
>
>** Dealing Flop ** [ 3d, Th, 2h ]
>
>hotmark777 bets [$65].
>
>nbvcxz calls [$65].
>
>AlwayzHot raises [$375].
>
>hotmark777 folds.
>
>nbvcxz calls [$310].
>
>** Dealing Turn ** [ 4s ]
>
>nbvcxz checks.
>
>AlwayzHot is all-In [$189]
>
>nbvcxz calls [$189].
>
>** Dealing River ** [ Jh ]
>
>nbvcxz shows [ Js, Jd ] three of a kind, jacks.
>
>AlwayzHot shows [ Qs, Qh ] a pair of queens.
>
>nbvcxz wins $1280 from the main pot with three of a kind, jacks.

JoeC · #2 04-10-2005, 02:09 PM

Please elaborate on what you're trying to accomplish by posting this.

KC50 · #3 04-10-2005, 02:24 PM

If anyone seriously thinks I could've played it any differently.

And Joe, please...another snide remark from you is not necessary.

Kind Regards,

KC

partygirluk · #4 04-10-2005, 02:25 PM

The problem is that this is just a bad beat story and these forums are really meant for strategy.

KC50 · #5 04-10-2005, 02:31 PM

I know it was a bad beat, a horrible beat in fact.

But I wasnt whining at all and was serious wanting to know if anyone plays it different.

Kind Regards,

KC

TheTimeIsUp · #6 04-10-2005, 03:03 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I know it was a bad beat, a horrible beat in fact.

But I wasnt whining at all and was serious wanting to know if anyone plays it different.

Kind Regards,

KC

[/ QUOTE ]

It doesn't seem like it with that thread title..

KC50 · #7 04-10-2005, 04:09 PM

I get the point from the unkind words of ALL who replied.

Please delete.

Thanks,

Kind Regards,

KC

KC50 · #8 04-10-2005, 04:11 PM

Thanks so much for finding it necessary to point out what has already been said.

Kind Regards,

KC

KowCiller · #9 04-11-2005, 12:58 PM

KC50-

I think everyone is being a bit harsh in this thread. You're a good player and you got your money in as a huge favorite. Don't be hard on yourself about this beat. These are the guys that pay your bills. You played it fine.

Good luck,
KoW

Loci · #10 04-11-2005, 01:16 PM

The reason why No lim players get touche around bad beats is that when you're a 95% favorite, you're going to lose 5% of the time. It's as good as it gets in this game, and if someone is going to call their whole stack for these odds, the least you can do is pay them off on the rare occasions where they hit. You didn't do anything wrong, but you know that deep down. Some of the players on here have lost thousands, sometimes tens of thousands of dollars when their opponents had only one or two cards left in the deck and still hit. It's the nature of the game. Better luck next time, stud.