#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20-40 second pair vs. passive-meister
I read a book that said not to raise JJ before the flop.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20-40 second pair vs. passive-meister
[ QUOTE ]
I read a book that said not to raise JJ before the flop. [/ QUOTE ] I read one that said 74s was a good hand. I put it back on the shelf. If you don't raise with JJ how do you play TT and 99? These hands play much better against a small field. You increase your chances of winning by getting rid of (mainly)the blinds who would see the flop cheaply with Ace little, K little, etc. You must charge these players a fee to draw. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Clarkmeister,
straighten this guy out, please.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20-40 second pair vs. passive-meister
"I read one that said 74s was a good hand."
Me too. It also said to split 8s and aces. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clarkmeister,
[ QUOTE ]
Clarkmeister, straighten this guy out, please. [/ QUOTE ] I'm retired. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20-40 second pair vs. passive-meister
Thought process..."There's 2 A's out, he didn't raise PF, he's bluffiing, I have a 9 I raise."
You have the 2+2 overbearing disease that afflicts many aspiring would be top players and posters. It's ridiculous how often plays like this are made and advocated. "River is rag. UTG+1 checks, I bet, he calls. Figured at this point that I'm likely to be good." I would've thought I was cooked on the turn. If he had half a brain or didn't consider you to be a LAG or maniac, why would he ch/call the turn and river if he was worried about a 9 or rag? The real question is what you have done if ch/r'd on the turn? Or river? Hint...overbearing 2+2 default answers is 3 bet. Steve A. |
|
|