#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stars Turbo vs Party
Was wondering if anyone had any input between the two. While the stars stt is turbo it still seems like a better structure than party. It looks like both take around 40 minutes to play but the stars tournies seem to have more flop play later in the game as opposed to partys all-in or fold structure. Some may say that stars' playerbase is alot better but I can't really tell. Any opinions?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Turbo vs Party
Toma(y)to Tomato
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Turbo vs Party
I've started to play at Stars to clear some of my backlogged bonuses and I haven't found the $16s or $26s to be any more difficult than the Party $22s.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Turbo vs Party
i usually play stars regular but in the last week i've played about 5 turbos (2 1 table, 2 5-table and 1 2-table). By level 4 in one we had played 17 hands (some disconnected, etc) - which sucked. overall i don't really care for party or turbos, but i prefer party since 10 players at a table and more importantly 10 hands/level instead of somewhere between 5-15 (the latter being later on).
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Turbo vs Party
I like the Stars 25+2's much better than the Party 22's and 33's, even with rakeback. I think they are slightly softer (in my experience) and are faster as well.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|