The worst city in America with a major sports franchise...

[tdarko]

[ QUOTE ]
traffic in houston? what is the freeway two lanes?

I can't imagine it even being close to anything in LA.

[/ QUOTE ]
first of all sponger the more lanes you have the less traffic you will have and second of all LA isn't much bigger than houston.

[tdarko]

[ QUOTE ]
but i'll put cincy's sports history up against any other city.



[/ QUOTE ]
you will put it up against new york city? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[LetYouDown]

Hell, I hate Cincinnati and I'd rank it over NYC's sports history if you're referring to the Yankees. Yeah...they had a ton of ridiculous players and buy chamionships. That isn't history to me.

[ChipWrecked]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
traffic in houston? what is the freeway two lanes?

I can't imagine it even being close to anything in LA.

[/ QUOTE ]
first of all sponger the more lanes you have the less traffic you will have and second of all LA isn't much bigger than houston.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you don't count the Valley, I think it would be smaller. That was talked about when the Valley tried to break away a year ago.

(I love capitalizing 'the Valley'. My wife is from west L.A., she hates the Valley so much [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img])

[Sponger15SB]

[ QUOTE ]
traffic in houston? what is the freeway two lanes?

I can't imagine it even being close to anything in LA.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
first of all sponger the more lanes you have the less traffic

[/ QUOTE ]

My point was that the only way I could see Houston having traffic was if they had a two lane freeway. I think I understand the concept of more lanes = less traffic.

[ QUOTE ]
second of all LA isn't much bigger than houston.

[/ QUOTE ]

LA = 3,845,541
Houston = 2,012,626

No.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0763098.html

[tdarko]

[ QUOTE ]
Hell, I hate Cincinnati and I'd rank it over NYC's sports history if you're referring to the Yankees. Yeah...they had a ton of ridiculous players and buy chamionships. That isn't history to me.

[/ QUOTE ]
wow this may go down as one of the more ridiculous statements i have ever heard on this site. this isn't the sports forum so i will keep it short and sweet, the yankees ARE HISTORY you nit and they were history before huge salaries. i am not from new york and am not even a fan, i don't even live anywhere close to nyc but i respect history enough to know that cincy has never had any ruth's or gherig's or dimaggio's or mantle's.

thats just baseball, the knicks have a history as well and so does their (oh this hurts to say this being a die hard cowboys fan) football team. the giants have more championships than the bengals and of course more history there. but wait there is more...we havent even mentioned the mets...see nyc goes on and on.

[ChipWrecked]

Dude's from Boston. He's a hatah.

[LetYouDown]

Not from Boston...lived there briefly, but born/raised several hundred miles away. I am, in fact, a "hatah" however. I have never understood how anyone can be a fan of that team. I do enjoy how every Yankee fan was born with a Yankee hat on and their "dad loved them" and they've loved them since they were old enough to hold a bat. Just wait until they haven't won anything in 10 years and then you'll see all the "die hard" Yankee fans...well, die.

[CallMeIshmael]

[ QUOTE ]
Hell, I hate Cincinnati and I'd rank it over NYC's sports history if you're referring to the Yankees. Yeah...they had a ton of ridiculous players and buy chamionships. That isn't history to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

How is it that hatred for a sports team can turn a seemingly rational human being into something that is capable of saying this.

I mean, even if you remove the Yankees, its still:

Mets, Giants, Rangers and Knicks vs Reds and Bengals [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[Tom1975]

Maybe you could learn to spell it correctly prior to insulting it.