Pokertracker Question.

[Weatherhead03]

For people who use PT...when labelling players what total agression stats do you use for a Tight-Aggressive, Tight-Passive, Loose-Aggressive, Loose-Passive?

[Webster]

I'll try again - cat stepped on keyboard

TA <22 >7 >1,75
TP <22 <6 >1.75
LA >30 >7 >1.75
LP >30 <5 <1.75

at the moment

Grinderswarehouse - NOT just another BLOG

[Tk79]

this should help linky

[Student]

Your linkage to information about PokerTracker statistical information is very, very useful! That's because PT is a very powerful tool, yet it's very difficult to get genuinely useful and timely information about it on this date in August, 2005. The linkage deals with a penetrating article about the power of PT, and it was written a year ago when enthusiasm was high for PT, and everyone wanted to have the special advantages over other players that mastery of PT seemed to recommend is possible! The resulting thread answered lots of questions folks had at that time.

But today PT is a product that it's actually difficult to even buy, though I'm sure the author never intended it that way! It's real easy to get the demo for PT, but then one faces several realities about PT. Though the intent is to support users lavishly, new users are going to have a very difficult time of it. It's simply not user friendly! Perhaps beginners to poker find it especially unfriendly, though it's perfectly obvious that 2+2 users who were here on 2+2 when PT made it's entrance swear by PT. Beginners swear at PT, simply because the dialogues that were extant on 2+2 concerning PT are all but unavailable to us. Supposedly 2+2 powerful search facility is there to fetch old posts, but these aren't transparent to beginners either.

So your linkage is especially useful! Maybe someone will wake up concerning PT; really anyone who wants to truly help beginners who appear on 2+2 could do this, as long as they had some sort of understanding of PT and has some good common sense on how to communicate what PT is, and what it can do!

Dave

[Weatherhead03]

Thanks.