|
|
#41
08-25-2005, 04:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Considering hiring a coach
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] IrieGuy does a little coaching from time to time, and is a cool guy besides. [/ QUOTE ][ QUOTE ] Not anymore [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Irie isn't cool anymore? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Dude, I'm sure he is still cool. Have you seen his avatar? (a la Dazed & Confused "Are you cool?") [/ QUOTE ] I AM his avatar [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] Well, I was last night anyway... 
|
|
#42
08-25-2005, 11:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Considering hiring a coach
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] you're running good, and should know that, and should know it well enough not to use it as some kind of advertizement. [/ QUOTE ] Claiming a 40% ITM at the 215s he either: A) Is the best STT player in the world. B) Mistakenly believes his results are sustainable. C) Knows his results are not sustainable, but advertises himself as a coach with them anyway. Which do you think it could be? [/ QUOTE ] Wow, the newest member of my ignore list. Well Done!
|
|
#43
08-25-2005, 11:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Considering hiring a coach
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] you dont take money off of donks at the 11s or 22s b/c of anything psychological, you have a different goal then most people, you try to improve and make as much money as possible while even an awful player who likes to play after work with a -30% ROI is only costing himself 3 dollars for 40 mins of entertainment after a long day of work, different goals and motives for players seperates winners and losers at nearly almost every level much more than psychology or natural talent. [/ QUOTE ] I disagree, but it's not very important. I think the people we're taking money from tend to expect to earn money. [/ QUOTE ] Noah, I agree. When I first started online, i expected to make money and didnt consider myself a "losing" player. Fact is, I was, for a long time, a loser and then merely break even player. I never admitted it to myself, but looking back at the way I played and the static nature of my "roll" (200 dollars or so) for 5 months I was not good. To the outside observer I was just a guy who was "enetertaining" himself on the cheap for a few hours a day. In fact, I was determined to learn. What makes good players different is that they can admit they suck and strive for more. It took a while for me. Not that I am good now (actually I'm awesome).
|
|
#44
08-25-2005, 12:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Considering hiring a coach
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Not anymore [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Not backing, anyway [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]. But coaching? Irie? [/ QUOTE ] Irie has posted recently that he's no longer coaching [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] You miss stuff when you're gone for months [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] When do you find out results on the bar???
|
|
#45
08-25-2005, 03:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Considering hiring a coach
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] you're running good, and should know that, and should know it well enough not to use it as some kind of advertizement. [/ QUOTE ] Claiming a 40% ITM at the 215s he either: A) Is the best STT player in the world. B) Mistakenly believes his results are sustainable. C) Knows his results are not sustainable, but advertises himself as a coach with them anyway. Which do you think it could be? [/ QUOTE ] Wow, the newest member of my ignore list. Well Done! [/ QUOTE ] I just call's 'em as I see's 'em. *fingers in ears* I'm not listening!
|
|
#46
08-25-2005, 04:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Considering hiring a coach
on megabet's other post, he mentioned %52 ITM over 500 $215. I remember Irie and some other posters talked about that ITM# can reach a true value with much less sample size than ROI, and 500 is probably an enough sample size. even with 10%/10%/32% (1/2/3) distribution (very very modest), he could have 34% ROI. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#47
08-25-2005, 04:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Considering hiring a coach
[ QUOTE ]
on megabet's other post, he mentioned %52 ITM over 500 $215. I remember Irie and some other posters talked about that ITM# can reach a true value with much less sample size than ROI, and 500 is probably an enough sample size. even with 10%/10%/32% (1/2/3) distribution (very very modest), he could have 34% ROI. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] yea, and i could have a 24" schlong.. yet 1/4th that is more likely. holla
|
|
#49
08-25-2005, 04:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Considering hiring a coach
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] yea, and i could have a 24" schlong.. yet 1/4th that is more likely. holla [/ QUOTE ] No, you've got it all wrong. It's just that your 24" schlong isn't sustainable. [/ QUOTE ] Why? Is your mom leaving town?
|
|
#50
08-25-2005, 05:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Considering hiring a coach
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] yea, and i could have a 24" schlong.. yet 1/4th that is more likely. holla [/ QUOTE ] No, you've got it all wrong. It's just that your 24" schlong isn't sustainable. [/ QUOTE ] neithers the 1/4th of that [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] holla
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
