#1
|
|||
|
|||
playing against a short stack limper
Me = $5800 Her = $800 10/20 NL commerce casino
I’m holding A,7 off on the button against 1 short stack limper so I decide to raise the pot thinking I have the best hand. Pot= $150 The Flop comes.. 8-4-2 RB she overbets makin it $225 to go perhaps I'm a bit more careful than most when it comes to the play of garbage hands hands in position. considering I came from the doldrums of the "restricted buy-in" side of the house where it’s explicitly difficult to get a short stack to fold but I decided to re-raise here. She’s been limping in with small suited cards, A,x suited and small pocket pair. Open bets her draws and check raises sets so I thought I had a pretty good read on her. I re-raised to $400 which about puts her all-in and she calls with A,3 suited with no flush re-draw Turn 8-4-2-5 River 8-4-2-5-6 After playing the 200 and 400 restricted buy-in games at the commerce and consistently winning for over a year I moved up to the 10/20 NL min $600 about 4 months ago. I’m playin well but I’m lookin for a critical eye to offer up scenarios or suggestions about playing against short stacked players. Although she turned her str8 and I rivered a bigger one I thought my re-raise on the flop should have won the pot right there figuring she would lay down a pinned wheel.. Comments? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: playing against a short stack limper
err how does the re-raise to 400 put her all-in, she has 800 stack, pre-flop she put in about 60-80....
also, i think the flop raise is bad especially after the overbet, shes not folding |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: playing against a short stack limper
she limped for $20
called my raise of $50 leaving her with $730 pot is about $150 she bets $225 leaving her with $505 my bet of $400 pot commits her if she calls since it would leave her with $105 therefore folding or pushing was her next move I thought.. The over bet looked more like a steal and since no body felt the urge to look her up (as she's done this before) I felt that was the best way to. I thought I was good PF and thought I was still good on the flop which is why I re-raised.. the overbet should have warned me though that she probably wasn't going anywhere.. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: playing against a short stack limper
In that game, I would make this $100 - $120 to go PF if I felt like raising in your spot.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: playing against a short stack limper
[ QUOTE ]
she limped for $20 called my raise of $50 leaving her with $730 pot is about $150 she bets $225 leaving her with $505 my bet of $400 pot commits her if she calls since it would leave her with $105 therefore folding or pushing was her next move I thought.. The over bet looked more like a steal and since no body felt the urge to look her up (as she's done this before) I felt that was the best way to. I thought I was good PF and thought I was still good on the flop which is why I re-raised.. the overbet should have warned me though that she probably wasn't going anywhere.. [/ QUOTE ] your wording in your post was flawed. you said you raised TO 400, when it should be you raised 400 MORE. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: playing against a short stack limper
maybe a bigger raise was a better idea.. but, did I not want the call?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: playing against a short stack limper
correct...my apologies. I hope it is clearer now [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: playing against a short stack limper
Yeah - I assume you're trying to isolate her and in that game, the blinds will often call an additional $50, while they will not often call an additional $100. And if she folds, fine, thats a free $50 with a crappy ace - we'll take that.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: playing against a short stack limper
normaljoe: i have never seen the term "pinned wheel" before. I like it.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: playing against a short stack limper
fold pf
|
|
|