Movie: Saw II

[Dominic]

the first movie was one of the worst pieces of garbage I have ever sat through. Cinematic crap. Made by people who have no clue about story, pacing, acting or film technique. If you liked it, then you have no clue about such matters, either.

I can't comment on the second one since I have not seen it.

[NobodysFreak]

The guy just came off as being really contrived. Irrationality in that situation is the last thing anyone needs. Everyone else was starting to piece things together and he goes crazy. He could hardly stand, was coughing up blood, yet pounding like a madman on a steel door only to do a 180 and reach his senses when he finds the two of them in the basement. It never occured to him that he needed his own number? I'd much rather cut a two inch section of my neck out than work with everyone else who's stuck in the same situation.

[Sponger15SB]

[ QUOTE ]
the first movie was one of the worst pieces of garbage I have ever sat through. Cinematic crap. Made by people who have no clue about story, pacing, acting or film technique. If you liked it, then you have no clue about such matters, either.

[/ QUOTE ]

ok? so?

I didn't see the movie btw.

[Dominic]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
the first movie was one of the worst pieces of garbage I have ever sat through. Cinematic crap. Made by people who have no clue about story, pacing, acting or film technique. If you liked it, then you have no clue about such matters, either.

[/ QUOTE ]

ok? so?

I didn't see the movie btw.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL...i just hated this movie...that's all.

[Inthacup]

Don't you film porn?

[Dominic]

[ QUOTE ]
Don't you film porn?

[/ QUOTE ]

I used to, yes. And anything I've made in porn is better than that piece of garbage.

Oh, and by the way? I've also sold feature length screenplays, produced and directed commercials and music videos, and was a staff writer for a sitcom. So yes, even though I have worked in both the legitimate and the adult side of the film industry, I feel I have a valid point of view when it comes to filmmaking.

Just as anyone who likes the movie Saw has a valid POV, even though I don't agree with it.

[orange]

Saw it tonight. The paper gave it terrible reviews (1 1/2 stars/4), but it was better than I expected. First one is still better, as it is a mystery as well as a slasher film. The second does not have as much mystery elements in it.

I recommend this movie if you have seen the first. This one is more gory, but lacks the guessing that the first has. A general rundown of the movie is 7 people are locked in a house and are forced to find clues in order to leave the house. There is a nerve gas that is slowly killing them, which will kill them in 2 hours. Thats the basic gist of it.

[theredwave]

Watched Doom at the Grand tonight, it was mediocre if you like the video game, and terrible if you've never played it before. I'm not sure why I'm posting this here, but I don't like creating new threads while drunk for fear of [censored].

[Ogre]

I saw it on friday. I liked them both. I can't decide which one i liked better but I think I liked Saw 1 more but I watched part of "House of Wax" later the same night after seeing saw II which made Saw II look like the best movie ever.

[KaneKungFu123]

its really [censored] lame to have a bunch of big titty girls, one not wearing a bra, who dont manage to get naked during the enitre movie.

Saw II sucked. There was no character development. These types of movies are supposed to be about the characters caught inside these events and their reactions, etc.

All this movie was about was triyng to throw a bunch of twists and curves at you and gore and blood and guts. they didnt even have the common curtiousy to have one of the chicks take her tits out.

edit: take the spaghettio-o's scene from seven. that is gruesome but funny and creative and cool in general.

none of the gruesome scenes in Saw II fits that description.

*/*****