30/60 Dealing with super-aggros

[Poldi]

[ QUOTE ]
Not to be results oriented, but the results suggested that a bet/3-bet the turn line would have saved your ass and not let him hit his 6-outer.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I didnt ever see him folding, I thought he might even cap me with a worse hand. But now that I see he really played 86o that way, I doubt he would have showed it down against a turn 3bet.
On the other side, you cant be sure that someone is laying it down when he gives so much unwarranted action so far.
I´m very interested in what would have happened. We ll never know..

[Poldi]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, I am SK.sTOrM. Do you play WC3?

[/ QUOTE ]

I knew Sk.Tom was an uber gosu WC3 player!

I harbor a small DoTA addiction still -.-

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Yeah, DotA was great. My clanmates played it all the time.

[stoxtrader]

I dont think you should question your turn play here at all. I think it is 100% correct - I just wrote a magazine submission that speaks of this situation and my thesis is that a check-behind is a good play that is underused.

[Grisgra]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Not to be results oriented, but the results suggested that a bet/3-bet the turn line would have saved your ass and not let him hit his 6-outer.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I didnt ever see him folding, I thought he might even cap me with a worse hand. But now that I see he really played 86o that way, I doubt he would have showed it down against a turn 3bet.
On the other side, you cant be sure that someone is laying it down when he gives so much unwarranted action so far.
I´m very interested in what would have happened. We ll never know..

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe it wouldn't be optimal against someone THIS laggy, but the more I think about it the more I like the bet/3-bet line, especially if I haven't been noticed making any big bluffs. I think rory actually posted a thread a few months ago where he suggested such a line.