|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: why the disparity between knowledge and results?
I think that of those who do read the book, many read it like a novel, not doing the problems, thinking out the answers, learning to do the analysis, and especially taking the time to read the important books a second or third time.
("Important": I have read TOP 4 times, Positively Fifth Street and Killer Poker once. Maybe I am guilty, there may be something in KP that I just didn't get the first time, but I wasn't impressed.) Doc |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: why the disparity between knowledge and results?
I also only read Killer Poker once, and this was over a year ago, but I thought the book was garbage.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: why the disparity between knowledge and results?
[ QUOTE ]
I have read TOP 4 times, Positively Fifth Street and Killer Poker once. Maybe I am guilty, there may be something in KP that I just didn't get the first time, but I wasn't impressed. Doc [/ QUOTE ] Forget Killer Poker. You'd be better off rereading PFS for some relaxation and entertainment. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: why the disparity between knowledge and results?
I kind of knew that. Thanks for the feedback.
My real point tho, was that people tend to READ, not STUDY. There is a difference. Doc [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
|
|