100NL 6 max general question

[xorbie]

Is it just me or the players here as bad as 25NL players? I'm finding it so easy to run over these tables, and I'm actually finding it hard to get payed off on some of my hands (low sample size though, so could just be an accident).

[amoeba]

I'm finding it just as loose as the NL25s and thats caused me to lose alot to bluffs that get called down and 3rd pair hitting trips on the river against my overpair.

I find that continuation betting doesn't work that well at the 100s and 25s but strangely works fairly well at the 50s at least in my experience.

[xorbie]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm finding it just as loose as the NL25s and thats caused me to lose alot to bluffs that get called down and 3rd pair hitting trips on the river against my overpair.

I find that continuation betting doesn't work that well at the 100s and 25s but strangely works fairly well at the 50s at least in my experience.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? Maybe I just have freakishly good table selection. I was at a table today where I was VPIP 40%, PFR 12% and I only went to showdown 20% of the time, either by dropping missed continuation bets or picking it up on flop/turn. I was 20BB/100, without really winning any big hands.

[amoeba]

maybe I should pick weak tight tables.

I think those are actually better for 6max as you are more aggressive.

Therefore, shouldn't you look for a low pot size table?

[Burt Reynolds]

I had a table like that. A bunch of weak tighties. I kept writing "too easy" in the chat everytime I won a pot. Eventually, I think it might have worked. Left at $85 from $25 .

[MarkL444]

i think the 100s used to be a lot worse back when there was only 6 tables at the 200. but yeah, they suck