Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-10-2005, 02:27 PM
Andrew Fletcher Andrew Fletcher is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 0
Default Ok, I surrender. (lc)

After putting my feet back into the water at 10NL with a new understanding of poker theory and a determination to play LAG, I’m throwing in the towel. I’m just going to play ABC TAG at these stakes. Yeah, I know my sample size isn't nearly big enough, but I don't think I can handle the flucations that are present in this type of playing style.

I believe we are giving up profit by playing so few hands against players that we obviously have an edge against. We should be calling with 97o when a weak-tight player raises 4x from UTG and gets two callers. We should be playing stuff like 6h4h in LP against three limpers. We can outplay these guys post-flop, I know we can. And no, "outplay" does not just mean "bluff them off the best hand." They ain't folding, so that's not what I'm talking about.

You TAGs win this round.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-10-2005, 02:35 PM
stu-unger stu-unger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: bluffing calling stations
Posts: 284
Default Re: Ok, I surrender. (lc)

no one is telling u how to play, man. the fact is that we all play ssnl and most of have found that a solid TAG style is the most profitable. its not the only way to play winning poker at ssnl, it is just the most popular and probably the easiest. if u want to play a LAGy style go ahead, but first learn what it means and how to play a LAG game...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2005, 02:41 PM
Andrew Fletcher Andrew Fletcher is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 0
Default Re: Ok, I surrender. (lc)

This post isn't meant to be angry or anything. I've learned tons of stuff from everyone on this forum.

I personally think that a traditional style of LAG (or at least, what most people on this board think of as LAG) play would be a disaster at SSNL. However, I'm trying to advocate that by playing such a small selection of hands pre-flop, we're giving up an edge post flop. While this might be a slightly looser style than people currently advocate playing, I think it could be more profitable.

The idea that there are four styles of play...TAG, LAG, Loose-Weak, Tight-Weak, are overly simplistic and best left in the bad books they appear in.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2005, 03:20 PM
Logik Logik is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
Default Re: Ok, I surrender. (lc)

Thinking loose aggressive styles do not work at small stakes. As stakes increase, thinking loose aggressive styles go up in profitability.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-10-2005, 03:32 PM
Andrew Fletcher Andrew Fletcher is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 0
Default Re: Ok, I surrender. (lc)

I just don't think there is only one style of play that can win at small stakes.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-2005, 03:33 PM
ajmargarine ajmargarine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pwning Robby Gordon
Posts: 798
Default Re: Ok, I surrender. (lc)

[ QUOTE ]
We can outplay these guys post-flop, I know we can.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well of course we can. That's how you win. At 10NL thru 50NL the way you outplay someone postflop is to make the best hand and get them to put money in the middle when they are drawing thin or drawing dead. You outplay them by getting more value from your made hands than they do with theirs. And by losing less than they do postflop with second best or worse hands.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.