Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-27-2005, 02:36 AM
Garland Garland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 351
Default To fire again or not to fire again...

I had been making many button bets with or without the goods when checked to me on the flop. So given standard loose opposition, would you fire again on the turn?

All comments appreciated,

Garland

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (9 handed) converter

CO ($587.1)
Garland ($639.4)
SB ($839.3)
BB ($558)
UTG ($700.6)
UTG+1 ($1677.2)
MP1 ($331.75)
MP2 ($661.65)
MP3 ($604.2)

Preflop: Garland is Button with K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $3.
UTG calls $6, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP1 calls $6, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP3 calls $6, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Garland calls $6, SB (poster) completes, BB checks.

Flop: ($36) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, MP1 folds, MP3 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Garland bets $29</font>, SB calls $29, BB folds, UTG calls $29, MP3 folds.

Turn: ($123) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, UTG checks, Garland ????
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-27-2005, 03:15 AM
Chris Daddy Cool Chris Daddy Cool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 401
Default Re: To fire again or not to fire again...

against loosies i like betting here. they will call you with a lot here.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-27-2005, 03:21 AM
BluffTHIS! BluffTHIS! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 375
Default Re: To fire again or not to fire again...

You are making a big assumption about two players making loose calls on the flop here. It is very possible that you are up against someone sandbagging a flopped flush or who has a hand that beats yours, and another player with a better flush draw than yours. I would bet against 1 player but check behind against 2.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-27-2005, 06:29 AM
fisherman112 fisherman112 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: To fire again or not to fire again...

[ QUOTE ]
You are making a big assumption about two players making loose calls on the flop here. It is very possible that you are up against someone sandbagging a flopped flush or who has a hand that beats yours, and another player with a better flush draw than yours. I would bet against 1 player but check behind against 2.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-27-2005, 07:45 AM
creedofhubris creedofhubris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 35
Default Re: To fire again or not to fire again...

Against one guy, easy bet. Against 2, I think a check is better, particularly since you have a diamond.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-27-2005, 02:24 PM
edge edge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: To fire again or not to fire again...

I like betting again and not putting in any more money after that.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-27-2005, 04:37 PM
muzungu muzungu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 196
Default Re: To fire again or not to fire again...

Garland-

How do you feel about calling a bet on a blank river if you check behind? Lately, if I am considering doing so, I would rather bet the turn and then check behind on the river (or fold to a river lead). So, if your choices are betting here or checking and calling on a blank river, I would bet. However, with two callers on the flop perhaps you would be best off not putting any more $ on any street. I think it is pretty close- if I bet it is going to be a fairly small one ($70 or so). In practice, I'm probably considering my reads on the players and going with my instinct (which is not particularly helpful advice, that is just what I do when I think it is a tossup).

-muz
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-28-2005, 12:01 AM
Tony.T Tony.T is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 71
Default Re: To fire again or not to fire again...

I dont like checking and then calling
Like someone else said, bet and fold to a raise
or a river bet
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-28-2005, 12:57 AM
captZEEbo1 captZEEbo1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 264
Default Re: To fire again or not to fire again...

Everyone really advocates checking here? Personally I'd put about a 1/2 pot bet in here and check any river no matter what hits. You overbet flop though IMO. I doubt anyone c/r bluffs or semibluffs here.

I bet hands like J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] might call your flop bet, since you bet from the button.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-28-2005, 03:33 AM
SpaceAce SpaceAce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,074
Default Re: To fire again or not to fire again...

[ QUOTE ]
Against one guy, easy bet. Against 2, I think a check is better, particularly since you have a diamond.

[/ QUOTE ]

How much value do you assign to the ten of diamonds with two people calling your bet on a three-diamond flop?

SpaceAce
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.