|
|
|
|
#1
12-13-2005, 04:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ZeeJustin: A Case Study
[ QUOTE ]
I think the data is interesting, but should be taken with a grain of salt. -Scott [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. I set out most of those points in the beginning of my post. 
|
|
#2
12-13-2005, 09:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ZeeJustin: A Case Study
ALL statisical data analysis should be taken with a grain of salt.
The purpose of this post was to attempt to quantify Justin's skill level, not to paint an accurate picture of MTT ROI as a whole, nor to prepare Justin's taxes (LOL). The data sample, although from only one site is perfectly adequate for that end. It is common to use whatever data is easily available and extrapolate from that. I don't think Justin deliberately plays lousy on other sites, or better on Stars, so the general assumptions are valid. Another great thing about this post, is that it puts things into prespective.
|
|
#3
12-13-2005, 12:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ZeeJustin: A Case Study
[ QUOTE ]
ALL statisical data analysis should be taken with a grain of salt. [/ QUOTE ] That's really really really wrong.
|
|
#4
12-13-2005, 12:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ZeeJustin: A Case Study
[ QUOTE ]
nice post. especially nicec because i like to be reminded how crazy mtt's are, while i'm at the very end of a downswing. [/ QUOTE ] FYP [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].
|
|
#5
12-13-2005, 04:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ZeeJustin: A Case Study
Sobering data to be sure, although as far as im concerned not all that surprising. Whats surprising to me is that Justin thinks there's anything to be embarassed about. These are great stats really. Oh, and anybody who would make the comment "he would be a losing player without his top two cashes" is missing the point of MTTs entirely.
|
|
#6
12-13-2005, 04:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ZeeJustin: A Case Study
[ QUOTE ]
Sobering data to be sure, although as far as im concerned not all that surprising. Whats surprising to me is that Justin thinks there's anything to be embarassed about. These are great stats really. Oh, and anybody who would make the comment "he would be a losing player without his top two cashes" is missing the point of MTTs entirely. [/ QUOTE ] the guy that is still massively +ev after taking out his top 2 cashes either A) never goes really deep B) rhymes with colson
|
|
#7
12-13-2005, 11:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ZeeJustin: A Case Study
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Sobering data to be sure, although as far as im concerned not all that surprising. Whats surprising to me is that Justin thinks there's anything to be embarassed about. These are great stats really. Oh, and anybody who would make the comment "he would be a losing player without his top two cashes" is missing the point of MTTs entirely. [/ QUOTE ] the guy that is still massively +ev after taking out his top 2 cashes either A) never goes really deep B) rhymes with colson [/ QUOTE ] C) Rhymes with JohnnyTax
|
|
#9
12-13-2005, 04:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ZeeJustin: A Case Study
[ QUOTE ]
i wish i had a 888% ROI [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Lately I'd settle for 88%
|
|
#10
12-13-2005, 04:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ZeeJustin: A Case Study
[ QUOTE ]
Whats surprising to me is that Justin thinks there's anything to be embarassed about. [/ QUOTE ] Seriously. If nothing else, this data could be a great point of reference for an essay explaining what it means to play MTTs and the differences between massive field MTTs and every other form of poker so far as money, winning and results are concerned. So... who's gonna write it? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
