|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: battle of blinds on bubble
[ QUOTE ]
i'd be calling hands like 77, A8, KQ, maybe more. villain is deep enough that he can call, lose, and still be comfortably ahead of the shorty. [/ QUOTE ] My blind defense is a lot weaker than my blind stealing right now but what you listed was right about where I would draw the line. rvg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: battle of blinds on bubble
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i'd be calling hands like 77, A8, KQ, maybe more. villain is deep enough that he can call, lose, and still be comfortably ahead of the shorty. [/ QUOTE ] My blind defense is a lot weaker than my blind stealing right now but what you listed was right about where I would draw the line. rvg [/ QUOTE ] did you run sngpt for that range? also, what do you think an average villain's range will be there? i'd guess a little looser, but i'm not sure. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: battle of blinds on bubble
Well SNGPT doesn't give you ranges - it does give you templates but really the ranges that people call with are based on so many factors so really it is experience that tells you what their range might be in any given scenario. SNGPT lets you analyze results based on the ranges you determine for each player.
I'd say the average tight player goes with that range while a loose player would open it up considerably. Any pair, any ace, most kings and probably any 2 face cards. rvg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: battle of blinds on bubble
[ QUOTE ]
i'd be calling hands like 77, A8, KQ, [/ QUOTE ] i was just curious, so i ran some pokerstove numbers to see what kinds of hands do well against that range. A6o = 31.4% K9o = 31.5% AJo = 46.1% AJs = 50.8% |
|
|