Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2005, 05:46 PM
sammy_g sammy_g is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 0
Default Too passive with KK?

I hate the way I played this hand. I think I was ahead on the turn, but I wanted to induce a bluff from a worse hand and not lose so much if I was against trips. Dunno about the river fold.

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (6 max, 4 handed) converter

BB ($110.58)
UTG ($75.15)
Hero ($135.55)
SB ($85.9)

Preflop: Hero is Button with K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.5.
<font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $2</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $6</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, UTG calls $4.

Flop: ($13.50) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">UTG bets $10</font>, Hero calls $10.

Turn: ($33.50) 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
UTG checks, Hero checks.

River: ($33.50) A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">UTG bets $30</font>, Hero folds.

Final Pot: $63.50
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2005, 06:59 PM
beginnersluck13 beginnersluck13 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 85
Default Re: Too passive with KK?

I think that you didn't necessarily play the hand badly, but that you just didn't get any information as to what villian has. I would be tempted to put in a raise on the flop, or atleast a 2/3rds pot sized bet on the turn to see where I am at, if he calls I am check/folding the river and if he raises I would probably toss the hand barring other reads.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2005, 07:46 PM
eagletmr eagletmr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 107
Default Re: Too passive with KK?

I agree with the previous post. I' like raising here on the flop to find out where I am at. If you choose to call, definitely bet the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2005, 08:11 PM
TexArcher TexArcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 134
Default Re: Too passive with KK?

With no read, I'd double the bet on the flop.

And if not, I'd definitely be betting at that turn after his check.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2005, 10:30 PM
savman savman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 163
Default Re: Too passive with KK?

[ QUOTE ]
With no read, I'd double the bet on the flop.

And if not, I'd definitely be betting at that turn after his check.

[/ QUOTE ]

doubling the bet...or minraising is a bad idea here...all it does is invite an agressive villain to threebet us here and cause us to lay down the best hand. Against a LAG i favor calling down here. If you raise a LAG u give him a chance to out play you with some maniacal over the top raise...if you call him down you can let him shovel all of his chips to you. Sometimes he will wake up with a J, but IMO this line is +EV against LAG.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-03-2005, 10:33 PM
savman savman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 163
Default Re: Too passive with KK?

if you are calling the flop you should not be folding the river.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-03-2005, 10:50 PM
Voltron87 Voltron87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: checkraising young children
Posts: 1,326
Default Re: Too passive with KK?

[ QUOTE ]
if you are calling the flop you should not be folding the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

nobody should listen to this advice.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-03-2005, 10:58 PM
sammy_g sammy_g is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 0
Default Re: Too passive with KK?

[ QUOTE ]
if you are calling the flop you should not be folding the river.

[/ QUOTE ]
i was more afraid of the ace than the jack.

but i think it's a call given how weakly i played the hand.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-03-2005, 11:31 PM
jonnyUCB jonnyUCB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: University of California BERKELEY
Posts: 222
Default Re: Too passive with KK?

reraise more preflop. You should be doing this with a wide range of hands 4-handed, on the button esp
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-03-2005, 11:46 PM
savman savman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 163
Default Re: Too passive with KK?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
if you are calling the flop you should not be folding the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

nobody should listen to this advice.

[/ QUOTE ]

give me a break....ridiculous post...nothing has changed, hero called a pot bet on flop. you think villain was betting backdoor flush, or A high.

the point i was making is why in the world are you calling the flop just to fold to a river pot. if you dont think your hand is good on the flop, fold. why call and fold to another pot bet when nothing has changed. that is insane. i mean were you calling on the flop hoping to spike a king, get real.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.