Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-06-2005, 07:17 PM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 197
Default Re: 3-bet or just call?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
A flush wins around 83% of the time so its a resonable assumption. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
What is with the influx of these ridiculous equity assumptions? Put villian on a range that gives Hero the pot 83% of the time on the river and post it so I can laugh at you.

[/ QUOTE ]
thank you very much.

it's like saying after the flop is 777 and you hold AA, "uh it's like 15000:1 to flop quads, cap every street, duh."
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-06-2005, 07:21 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 3-bet or just call?

Guys it was a joke intended towards spicymoose.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-06-2005, 07:23 PM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 197
Default Re: 3-bet or just call?

the obvious answer is to stop joking.

ok i take back my 15000:1 crap
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-06-2005, 07:24 PM
Spicymoose Spicymoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Default Re: 3-bet or just call?

[ QUOTE ]
Guys it was a joke intended towards spicymoose.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, what you said was pretty funny, but I think what they said was funnier [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. This thread is just full of jokes. What can you expect when it was started by a joker?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-06-2005, 07:29 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 3-bet or just call?

Im slow.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-06-2005, 08:41 PM
private joker private joker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,943
Default Re: 3-bet or just call?

[ QUOTE ]
Why on earth would you think you should reraise the river? You just explained every reason not to.

Edit: was it because you won the hand and wanted more money? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Or maybe it was because my 3-bet was capped and I had to call?


No... yeah I called and won the hand. He had K8o (?) and MHIG. It's not that I greedily wanted more money; I'm just not sure how much a flush is worth here in this spot. At full ring, I'm always calling this -- but since I have much fewer hands at 6-max, I was wondering if maybe this is one of the differences, that I should be 3-betting here.

Guess not.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-07-2005, 05:01 PM
zephed zephed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Gorie fan club member #2 and official whittler.
Posts: 611
Default Re: 3-bet or just call?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why on earth would you think you should reraise the river? You just explained every reason not to.

Edit: was it because you won the hand and wanted more money? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Or maybe it was because my 3-bet was capped and I had to call?


No... yeah I called and won the hand. He had K8o (?) and MHIG. It's not that I greedily wanted more money; I'm just not sure how much a flush is worth here in this spot. At full ring, I'm always calling this -- but since I have much fewer hands at 6-max, I was wondering if maybe this is one of the differences, that I should be 3-betting here.

Guess not.

[/ QUOTE ]
Your opponent sounds like the type of player to usually raise when a tightie bets, but usually check when tightie checks. Am I right?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.