Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:14 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Reducing Variance in Shorthanded Poker

Hey,

I've been playing 5/10 shorthanded 1 to 3 tables, and I think I'm a winning player longrun, especially after rakeback. I don't know because my balance fluctuates constantly between +500 and down -800. Constantly. I'm a 19 year old college student, and these 1200 dollar plus swings are an awful lot of money for me.

Anyways, for a break, I decided to 4 table 3/6 instead of 5/10. Holy crap! The players are so bad. I never have to worry about a 2+2er destroying me. It felt like play money, and me just running over everyone with a semi. It felt great.

Anyways, I'd like some tips on reducing variance, because I think I can make more $/hr on 5/10. Maybe not as good of a BB/100 as 3/6, but I need some tips on reducing variance for this to be viable.

It is not a bankroll issue, it's just that the dollar amounts that I'm winning/losing are an unhealthily large amount of my net worth/life savings, so reducing variance is important, even at the expense of a little EV. Also, I think that thinking about how much money each chip is worth detrimentally affects my play. Knowing I'm dealing with 100's of dollars per hand really affects me. At 3/6, I never got upset about a bad beat because it was such a comparatively low amount of money.

Tips/Thoughts?

Thx,

Kevin
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:57 AM
rivered rivered is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 17
Default Re: Reducing Variance in Shorthanded Poker

If you want to reduce the swings if winning less it's pretty simple - play 3/6. That's the only option.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-16-2005, 04:08 AM
mdeck mdeck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: IN YOUR FACE! IN YOUR FACE!
Posts: 112
Default Re: Reducing Variance in Shorthanded Poker

I believe if the stakes are too significant in a literal sense, then you are playing above your comfort level and while your bankroll may be large enough to withstand the swings of 5/10 emotionally you may be unable to. This in turn might lead to tilt, which causes you to play a less-than-optimal game.

Are you saying you have constant 120BB swings? I know that swings happen, but if you're swinging that big with any regularity that I'd suspect that something is irregular with your game.

I think if you aren't prepared to handle the swings of 5/10 monetarily, you should stay at 3/6 for a while until the dollar amounts are more palpable.

You already answered your own question. Play where you are most comfortable.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-16-2005, 04:51 AM
mungpo mungpo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 185
Default Re: Reducing Variance in Shorthanded Poker

Don't play at the 5/10.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-16-2005, 05:16 AM
kahntrutahn kahntrutahn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 78
Default Re: Reducing Variance in Shorthanded Poker

Stick to 3/6... you aren't mentally ready for 5/10 and thats probably causing you to play like ****. The lower BB/100 means you're variance will be much worse, and into a vicious cycle you go!


P.S. there was a post about this recently, and some good points were made about your reducing variance question (should you still feel the need to play 5/10, even though its obvious you aren't ready, use the search and dig a bit... the post is recent)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-16-2005, 06:31 AM
stripsqueez stripsqueez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Adelaide , South Australia
Posts: 1,055
Default Re: Reducing Variance in Shorthanded Poker

i guess it depends on what you want to acheive playing poker but to someone who does it seriously this post is ridiculous

how can you stop swings playing short handed limit ? - i suppose i would of enjoyed playing cricket more if it didnt hurt so damn much when the ball hit me - aussie rules probably would of been better if i never dislocated a finger - running might be ok if it never felt like i was going to collapse and die (except that i've come to appreciate thats whats good about it)

variance is the game - you either go with it or you play SNG's - learning how to lose is what short handed limit is mostly about

stripsqueez - chickenhawk
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-16-2005, 07:06 AM
mackthefork mackthefork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Reducing Variance in Shorthanded Poker

Variance is the creamy centre of the poker twinkie.

To paraphrase Bison, and convert him to English. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Mack
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-16-2005, 11:04 AM
meow_meow meow_meow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 180
Default Re: Reducing Variance in Shorthanded Poker

Welcome to running g00t
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-16-2005, 02:15 PM
MicroBob MicroBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: memphis
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: Reducing Variance in Shorthanded Poker

[ QUOTE ]

It is not a bankroll issue

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
the dollar amounts that I'm winning/losing are an unhealthily large amount of my net worth/life savings

[/ QUOTE ]


these two ideas couldn't be any more contradictory.




[ QUOTE ]
these 1200 dollar plus swings are an awful lot of money for me.

[/ QUOTE ]


if a $1200 swing is too much money for you then you don't have the bankroll to be playing 5/10.


I don't understand how you can say "it's not a bankroll issue" and also say "this is a lot of money to me."

what you are saying makes no sense to me at all.


You might as well be saying: "It's not a bankroll issue...it's just that it's a lot of my bankroll."
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-16-2005, 02:22 PM
DCWGaming DCWGaming is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 142
Default Re: Reducing Variance in Shorthanded Poker

As a newer initiate into the 5/10 SH world, I can tell you that if 1k is alot for you to lose, you should definitely move down. I've had a 380BB downswing. Dont know what your life savings is, but if you ran into one of those, I doubt you could stand back up again.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.