Possible new clues to Empire closings....

[Benjamin]

Thanks Orpheus.

Last time I looked that language wasn't in the T&C at Empire or Party, but it's been a month or so and I guess they've probably added it.

Ben

[Benjamin]

[ QUOTE ]
Last time I looked that language wasn't in the T&C at Empire or Party, but it's been a month or so and I guess they've probably added it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I take it back. Party and Empire do not include the language prohibiting accounts at multiple skins. Here is the same paragraph on each of their T&C pages:

[ QUOTE ]
11. Shared Games, Table and Database Platform.
Company reserves the right to run and utilize a shared table, server and database platform ("Shared Game/Table Platform") which enables players from PartyPoker.com to play with players coming into the games, tables and tournaments from other sites and brands to the same Shared Game/Table Platform so that the players may be pooled into common game/tables regardless of which site or brand they may have entered from. In such event, you agree that you may be pooled into these common game/tables, at Company's sole discretion, and that to the extent that you breach the terms and conditions of one site or brand, Company may have you blocked, in part or full, from the entire system so that you may not play through any site or brand. Further your play patterns, personal data, depositing limits and history may be calculated and shared across the system to counter fraud, over-depositing and other matters, as Company shall decide in its sole discretion.

[/ QUOTE ]

So, I stand by my claim that neither Party nor Empire has communicated to me (or most members) that accounts at multiple skins is prohibited.

B.