Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 01-22-2005, 07:21 AM
MarkL444 MarkL444 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 548
Default Re: The Errors I Saw

haha, maybe i am for saying that. im just confused now. i was chalking it up to their straight ability (which i believe has to be it), but i cant explain why.

i think it is because when they do make a straight it is the nuts. (or more likely to be the nuts)

im pretty sure you have to be wrong somehow.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 01-22-2005, 07:35 AM
Beach-Whale Beach-Whale is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 55
Default Re: The Errors I Saw

Never question the Master, eh?

I'm just trying to point out that everyone makes mistakes. It's a simple fact of life. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 01-22-2005, 07:39 AM
MarkL444 MarkL444 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 548
Default Re: The Errors I Saw

I feel pretty bad about doggin you and then not being able to defend myself. Im an idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 01-22-2005, 07:46 AM
Beach-Whale Beach-Whale is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 55
Default Re: The Errors I Saw

No, you are not. It's a natural reaction to a midget like me claiming that a giant like David has made a mistake. In 99.99% of the cases, the midget is wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 01-22-2005, 08:54 AM
jokerthief jokerthief is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: The Errors I Saw

You sir are the definition of asinine. By the way, you're wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 01-22-2005, 09:57 AM
Rudbaeck Rudbaeck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 555
Default Re: The Errors I Saw

[ QUOTE ]
i think it is because when they do make a straight it is the nuts. (or more likely to be the nuts)

[/ QUOTE ]

They can all make exactly the same straights, and the same number of straights. So 52s not being in group 8 (and specifically not being higher in group 8 than 42s) is a conceptual error put in print.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 01-22-2005, 10:14 AM
jokerthief jokerthief is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: The Errors I Saw

Except for the little fact that the larger gap makes the odds of getting a straight significantly less.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 01-22-2005, 10:24 AM
MarkL444 MarkL444 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 548
Default Re: The Errors I Saw

[ QUOTE ]
Except for the little fact that the larger gap makes the odds of getting a straight significantly less.

[/ QUOTE ]

Show me how 52s makes more straights (using both cards of course). Not saying yorue wrong, because that is what I initially thought was the answer before, I havent figure it out though.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 01-22-2005, 10:37 AM
Rudbaeck Rudbaeck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 555
Default Re: The Errors I Saw

[ QUOTE ]
Except for the little fact that the larger gap makes the odds of getting a straight significantly less.

[/ QUOTE ]

32s makes straights with the following boardcards:
A45
456

42s makes straights with the following boardcards:
A35
356

52s makes straights with the following boardcards:
A34
346


Your statement is false as we are up against the end of the card range here. No one is disputing that 78s makes more straights than 79s. But when we are walled off at one end of the straights the gaps cease to make a difference.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 01-22-2005, 10:38 AM
BarronVangorToth BarronVangorToth is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: Flawed Author-Cardplayer Articles

What some might not realize (David, I know you are not one of these "some") is that horrendous advice is printed in magazines, posted on RGP, and written into books each and every day when it comes to poker.

We have a country of mathematical illiterates and with poker having so much math involved, many of these people are now in the position of trying to "fudge" the math -- and, picking a random percentage out of the air, 90% of the people who see this pseudo-math don't know the difference.

You do. I do. Many 2+2'ers do. Most non-2+2'ers don't.

It's a sad world we live in -- sadder still when "experts" are anything but and pass off their "knowledge" to unexpecting masses who are far less able to separate wheat from chaff as you and Mason have trained 2+2'ers to be.

Barron Vangor Toth
www.BarronVangorToth.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.