Heh, sometimes you get a beat so nutty all you can do is laugh. *cry*

[PuppyKicker]

Erm yes. You've caught me! I am from Michigan originally ... oh the shame. What?

I actually would have capped with the aces here. I can see the argument for not doing so however. And I don't think that either the poster or the critics are complete morons for disagreeing.

Anyways, are you following me from thread to thread because of my hawt avatar action?

[BusterStacks]

Yea, here's a picture of your avatar




Hope you see the humor.

[PuppyKicker]

Huh? My avatar is a hot korean soccer fan. It isn't showing up??

[BusterStacks]

nope

[PuppyKicker]

DAMMIT. I was all excited about leaving Lurkerville and had this great avatar all lined up, and now it's all for nothing.

Now I have to search all night for a new one. Crap, crap, crap-on-a-stick.

[JasonK]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I am not a great player, but I can certainly see the merit of the argument for not capping with aces in that particular hand, given what the poster has said about the table dynamic and the UTG player.

*ducks and covers*

[/ QUOTE ]

That's cuz you = Lansing... sneaky.

[/ QUOTE ]

HAHAHAHA

[jrobb83]

[ QUOTE ]

On the turn, I thought I may be beaten by QQ, as it was the only hand besides KK that I could see that particular bettor 3 betting me with there. That is why I did not cap.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then why in the world would you bet the river?

[ QUOTE ]
Everyone thinks they're experts on here when they reverse-analyze a hand. They're usually not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then stop posting hands.

If your response to above is that you posted it for the pure entertainment value and did not want/expect strategy discussions, then you are an idiot. This is a poker strategy based board and any hand you post will be analyzed no matter where or why you post it.

And I really didn't find the beat entertaining at all. If I'm bored tomorrow I'll stir up the hand history of the hand in which my opponent was drawing only to runner-runner 1 outers to split the pot and made it. Now that's entertaining.

[AngryCola]

[ QUOTE ]
If I'm bored tomorrow I'll stir up the hand history of the hand in which my opponent was drawing only to runner-runner 1 outers to split the pot and made it. Now that's entertaining.

[/ QUOTE ]

That sounds similar to my worst beat ever. Two cards to come and my opponent had 1 out for a split. It hit on the river. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Oddly enough, I have never posted a bad beat. I guess I just find them kind of boring. I've read enough of those posts to last a lifetime.

[partygirluk]

Lansing:

i) Please explain how C/R someone ON YOUR LEFT will help protect your hand.
ii) Please admit that all your psychic predictions of how the actions will unfold were WRONG.
iii) Please explain why you bet the river AFTER SAYING YOU HAD SOMEONE ON QQ!!!!
iv) Please provide evidence of your stated winrates. I call BS!
v) Please explain why everyone disagrees with you on this post. Bear in mind that many of the players are internet pros at 15/30 or higher. As you can think on such a higher level than them, why aren't you killing the 100/200 game? Or are you? Please provide evidence.
vi) You ask us to come play against you on Party Poker, please provide your ID.

Please answer these questions Lansing.

[BigBaitsim (milo)]

You posted this as if it were a bad thing. Yes, I was annoyed last night when my KK got cracked when I jammed every street by some loser who stayed in with 46o and hit a gutshot on the river, but more importantly, I knew it was a good game and that as long as he and Mr. Cap It With Anything Soooted were at the table, eventually I would end up with many chips. I was right.