PartyGaming Press Release

[Mendacious]

So, why don't the vast majority of players migrate to the "skins" network instead of Party. Seems to me a little "play the skins" campaigning should be done.

I can

[smb394]

[censored] you.

[1800GAMBLER]

[ QUOTE ]
Where was this "released"? Just here in the Zoo?!?

[/ QUOTE ]

You must have the greatest timing in the world.

[Trix]

Good job...

This might be the one thing that will make me change to a non party site...

[Harv72b]

[ QUOTE ]
Everybody had already been panicking that the 15/30 games were getting REALLY tight because of all the 8-tabling 2+2'ers filling up all the tables.
Now everybody complains that they won't be getting rake-back there...even though it obviously means that many of those 8-tabling TAG's won't be filling up as many of those tables anymore.


Maybe I'm a 'glass is half-full' kind of guy but I just don't think this is all THAT horrible.
Playing poker for a living is all about making adjustments to changing conditions.
This particular change was one that I think was going to happen sooner or later.

[/ QUOTE ]

I [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] MicroBob.

[SoCalRugger]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Everybody had already been panicking that the 15/30 games were getting REALLY tight because of all the 8-tabling 2+2'ers filling up all the tables.
Now everybody complains that they won't be getting rake-back there...even though it obviously means that many of those 8-tabling TAG's won't be filling up as many of those tables anymore.


Maybe I'm a 'glass is half-full' kind of guy but I just don't think this is all THAT horrible.
Playing poker for a living is all about making adjustments to changing conditions.
This particular change was one that I think was going to happen sooner or later.

[/ QUOTE ]

I [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] MicroBob.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yep. Good post.

[IggyWH]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Everybody had already been panicking that the 15/30 games were getting REALLY tight because of all the 8-tabling 2+2'ers filling up all the tables.
Now everybody complains that they won't be getting rake-back there...even though it obviously means that many of those 8-tabling TAG's won't be filling up as many of those tables anymore.


Maybe I'm a 'glass is half-full' kind of guy but I just don't think this is all THAT horrible.
Playing poker for a living is all about making adjustments to changing conditions.
This particular change was one that I think was going to happen sooner or later.

[/ QUOTE ]

I [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] MicroBob.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, if only Bob knew how to type faster. Damn Bob, you're slacking on post count with all this drama.

[Python49]

So... let's see if I can sum up what's happend here with party and its players.

So... high volume players leave party because they can get rake back and still play against the same fishy players on the party net work but through a skin. Party's stock goes down and they feel they are getting screwed. So they decide to retaliate by cutting off the skins players from the fish on party.

I'd say party is smart, they recognize that the one thing they have to offer high volume players aside from rake back is bad players that make for easy money, and since they won't offer rake back they decide to just take access of bad players away from good players so that the sharks have to play against themselves.

So now people get screwed either way they go. Play on party with fishes and suffer huge rakes, or play on skins with better players (on avg) and get rake back. I think i'll go with the second option just so that party does not get another penny of my money.... and the OP of this thread can go F himself.

[theredwave]

you dumbass mike
i nearly hope you go bankrupt

[BigBrother]

Drop your jocks and grab your socks, boys... I'm at 17BB/100 for the last 2 1/2 hours.

ASF = 38.5, where's the fire?

Party On!

BJ and sidebet on the tables gotta go, however.