|
|
#81
10-29-2004, 02:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How I would have played Philips A,Q.
[ QUOTE ]
diagnosis [/ QUOTE ] Do you mean "analysis"? Sorry, but my english isn't very good. If you would bother to read the rest of my posts in this thread I believe thst I explain exactly what my position is. Of course you seem more interested in flapping your jaws than discussing this situation. Wouldn't bother me if you didn't bother reading anything I post. I'll do the same for you. Vince [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] 
|
|
#82
10-29-2004, 02:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How I would have played Philips A,Q.
Nothing in those two quotes is contradictory. Why not just keep yourself from reading aanything this imbicile has to say. I'll do the same for you.
Vince [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#83
10-29-2004, 02:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How I would have played Philips A,Q.
So a pro is someone that only shows his winnings. I get it.
Vince [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#84
10-29-2004, 02:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How I would have played Philips A,Q.
[ QUOTE ]
You're confident playing AQ out of position against Tomko and Hansen? Wow... [/ QUOTE ] Well, i suppose it could be said that PP pretty much eliminated the poosition factor by playing the way he did.
|
|
#85
10-29-2004, 03:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question for Matt Sklansky?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Is it just me or is Vince just a giant douche bag? [/ QUOTE ] Matt, Are you allowing this kind of stuff on this forum now? I'd like to see this fellows posting priveleges suspended. If you don't suspend him then please ensure he cannot reply to any of my posts. I will do in kind to his. If neither can be done, I do understand but regrettably will not post on 2 + 2 again. Thank you. Vince [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] WAAAH! Use yer ignore function.
|
|
#86
10-29-2004, 03:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How I would have played Philips A,Q.
[ QUOTE ]
You're confident playing AQ out of position against Tomko and Hansen -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes. Apparently Phillips isn't. Vince [/ QUOTE ] ROTFLMAO. wow man you are great. you feel comfortable playing three handed out of position w/aq with dewey and gus. you should get paul to crossbook with you.
|
|
#87
10-29-2004, 03:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How I would have played Philips A,Q.
[ QUOTE ]
If you do not feel confident that you will make the correct play after the flop then you should by all means move-in before the flop as Philips did. I say that as the same guy that can't afford "to lose" the WPT buy-in(s). [/ QUOTE ] and yet you still have not decided to divulge any of your great poker wisdom by telling us amatuers how to play post flop? so what if you hit no pair? what if you hit a queen? you're now playing out of position vs. an opponent you admit could have any two cards and is willing to gamble. is this the optimal situation to get into? lets say the flop is Ace 9 2 rainbow.....whats your play? please elaborate oh great poker guru.
|
|
#88
10-29-2004, 03:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How I would have played Philips A,Q.
[ QUOTE ]
So a pro is someone that only shows his winnings. I get it. [/ QUOTE ] Exactly! In reality I'm buried by the $3,000,000 in tournament entry fees I've dropped the last three years. Those $500,000 buyin tournaments really add up in a hurry. I give up, I need a backer. Know anyone?
|
|
#89
10-29-2004, 03:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question for Matt Sklansky?
[ QUOTE ]
Matt, Are you allowing this kind of stuff on this forum now? I'd like to see this fellows posting priveleges suspended. If you don't suspend him then please ensure he cannot reply to any of my posts. I will do in kind to his. If neither can be done, I do understand but regrettably will not post on 2 + 2 again. Thank you. Vince [/ QUOTE ] well judging by this thread.........that would be a huge loss.
|
|
#90
10-29-2004, 03:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: its really very pathetic
vince its really sad how you keep saying you'd just call but you wouldn't check/fold the flop...but refuse all requests to elaborate on what your play would be on the flop.
since you obviously KNOW the correct play....why don't you humor us with a reply to these scenarios: 1) flop comes A 10 2 rainbow.......whats your play 2)flop comes K 4 7 rainbow...........whats your play 3)flop comes 2 9 7 rainbow.........whats your play 4)flop comes 10 4 3 rainbow.......whats your play i would just love to hear your reply. hmmm........when i flop top pair and gus flops a set i'd check fold...when the flop comes K high i would bet out to get gus to fold.....and when the flop helps neither of us then i'd check fold again. sound like what you'd do vince?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
