#81
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOT rules clarification
nice post Dids
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOT rules clarification
[ QUOTE ]
nice post Dids [/ QUOTE ] Did you guys READ THE [censored] PATRICK EWING POST IN HIGH LIMIT!!! Diablos a whore! I know for a fact that he made out with _ women one night! |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOT rules clarification
[ QUOTE ]
what is OOT good for if we cannot mindlessly speculate about other posters while showing pics of naked women. [/ QUOTE ] I agree. The longer I participate in OOT, the more I think of it as a jungle. It should be. It should be pretty much free will up to the point of affecting somebody's real life, and even then there should be SOME leeway (see Lexington Brian). I now believe that the only bannings should be for generally sucking. FWIW, [censored] was doing a very good job in this department. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOT rules clarification
[ QUOTE ]
Until a post can go more than 20 replies without somebody being called a whore or a [censored], I think erring on the site of not openning up people to be insulted is probably wise. [/ QUOTE ] This thread qualifies. But now that you've got the ball rolling... |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOT rules clarification
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] nice post Dids [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOT rules clarification
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think it takes a really observant person to see that given the current culture of OOT, it's not exactly a place where people would want to put their personal lives on display. [/ QUOTE ]really since when? [ QUOTE ] This forum is just uniformly horrible towards women. Until a post can go more than 20 replies without somebody being called a whore or a [censored], I think erring on the site of not openning up people to be insulted is probably wise. [/ QUOTE ] true |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOT rules clarification
I would like to clarify a few things here.
First, to answer the question that everyone wants the answer to: mslif and I are in a relationship. We have been for a little over a month now. Second, I would like to explain how this happened. It wasn't a random drunk hookup as speculated in this thread. In July mslif PMed me about a post I made in OOT and later about a post I made in SMP. I replied to these PMs and we entered into a nice dialog about various topics. We exchanged PMs every few days and at some point the conversations were interesting enough to me that I offered her my AIM screenname. We started talking over AIM regularly and clicked really well. She came on the November Vegas trip and the first afternoon she was in Vegas we met up for lunch. We clicked just as well and by the end of the weekend it was apparent that we both wanted a relationship. Third, I would like to clarify why we were shy about this topic. We wanted privacy on this topic because a certain poster has harassed her and I on the forums and via PMs both before and since the Vegas trip. The nature of the harassment that she received was intense and she didn't want to have to deal with more of it from him nor anyone else. OOT is not kind to women. Lastly, I did not request nor did I approve of El Diablo being banned. I requested through Dids and Evan that his ban be reversed as soon as I heard about it. |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOT rules clarification
nice post jason...maybe people can leave this alone now...
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOT rules clarification
Thank you for not using "2+2 as an internet dating site".
|
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOT rules clarification
[ QUOTE ]
We wanted privacy on this topic because a certain poster has harassed her and I on the forums and via PMs both before and since the Vegas trip. [/ QUOTE ] "...a certain poster has harassed her and me..." |
|
|