#81
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
[ QUOTE ]
Lost my first three hands w/ AA (!!!) Still cashed out +6 BB. LOL. [/ QUOTE ] The swings will be brutal in this game, but the EV is amazing at the moment. Forget the donks that don't even know what they're playing, I see many RHE salty dogs overplaying rags over and over again. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
I disagree about the swings. The only hands I lost any decent amount of money on were when someone had a royal flush over my aces or kings full.
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Okay... KQs should be okay to, due to its straight flush and nut flush potential, no? [/ QUOTE ] Umm...I hate to break it to you, but there is no straight flush, there is no nut flush, there is only a royal flush. And you are as likely to get it with KQs as you are with ATs or AQs or KJs, etc. Flush=Winner in this game because every flush is royal. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I know. Fuzzy thinking on my part. Everything I have said in this thread so far is embarrasingly stupid, so I take it back. Having played the game a little, it seems like the good hands in this game are AA, KK, AK, QQ. AQ is okay too, KQ and AJ okay on the button and SB. AT, KJ, JJ = Not sure, maybe just in SB or something like that KT, QJ, QT, JT, TT = junk Or at least something close to that. Not sure how to play against raises though. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
[ QUOTE ]
Can I consider getting a Royal as my first ever Royal Flush? I thought getting my first Royal would be a lot more enjoyable?!?! [/ QUOTE ] You may not. I made three of them since yesterday. This game rocks. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
[ QUOTE ]
I want this game on Party! We should start a petition! [/ QUOTE ] That would really be something... imagine 10-tabling 15/30 royal holdem or $1000 NLRHE... jesus. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
This game is too easy to beat. I give it about one week before the rocks and people who know how to play it outnumber the fish 10:1.
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I want this game on Party! We should start a petition! [/ QUOTE ] That would really be something... imagine 10-tabling 15/30 royal holdem or $1000 NLRHE... jesus. [/ QUOTE ] this will never be spread because of the collusion potential. OTOH, i have been killing the $50 HU sNg's there for 2 days. i am 11 for 15. very soft players. |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
[ QUOTE ]
I disagree about the swings. The only hands I lost any decent amount of money on were when someone had a royal flush over my aces or kings full. [/ QUOTE ] I take this back. I just lost about 22BB at one table... with a lot of preflop raising, I guess there can be swings. Still much less than a HE 6mmx table though. |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
After seeing how some of these ppl play, it is hard to imagine them playing LHE...
If they suc this much at RHE, they should be playing tic tac toe instead. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate spreading Royal Holdem, but only limit
Flopping quads and losing really really sucks.
|
|
|