My HeadsUp for the title experiment. - Page 8

HC5831 · #71 03-17-2005, 03:36 AM

utt ooo. Are you saying the results you have posted are from your "optimal" play and not pushing every hand? I'm only interested in the results of pusing every hand HU. I couldn't care less what your HU % is at the 200 level. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

HC

citanul · #72 03-17-2005, 03:53 AM

read the freaking post if you want to know what the results are about.

citanul

Daliman · #73 03-17-2005, 03:54 AM

[ QUOTE ]
utt ooo. Are you saying the results you have posted are from your "optimal" play and not pushing every hand? I'm only interested in the results of pusing every hand HU. I couldn't care less what your HU % is at the 200 level. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

HC

[/ QUOTE ]

Bah on you, sir.

The push system has already proven to be approximately 47% effective at a minimum, but blinds make a big difference. I think the sweet spot is about 200-400.

raptor517 · #74 03-17-2005, 04:28 AM

well well well, maybe raptor will have to just push every hand. i dont think too many things right now could hurt his results. oh wait, thats me, damn u dalipunk

HC5831 · #75 03-17-2005, 04:58 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Bah on you, sir.

The push system has already proven to be approximately 47% effective at a minimum, but blinds make a big difference. I think the sweet spot is about 200-400.

[/ QUOTE ]

Daliman,

I would expect the level of the blinds to be key. 150-300 is definately too early to push every hand. 200-400 seems borderline to me. 250-500+ definately. I'm basing these thoughts on 1k starting chips. This would be a good strategy against a player who you know is better than you. In addition, an allin every hand strategy is good for players whose normal play HU is less optimal than the pushing strategy. I'm just trying to figure out how successful it is.

I thought your posts were for the push system, but I saw some posts to the contrary and got confused. I'm still not 100% positive, but I'll just assume your results are the post system. That being the case, I am very interested in the experiment. I was just saying that I don't care how you normally do HU without the experiment. You have my respect as a poker player on the forum, no offense intended. Sometimes us former Marines need things spelled out for us.

HC

mosch · #76 03-17-2005, 09:14 AM

Well, you inspired me to find and look at my numbers and to discover that I no longer have first place skew.

my last 819 single table sngs at stars: (about 25% $16, 50% 27, 25% 60)
1 - 126
2 - 126
3 - 122

I'm glad I looked because I used to have more firsts than seconds, and I also had more 4ths than 3rds... neither of those is true any longer, and I'm wondering if I've accidentally started playing to Not Lose on the bubble, and hadn't noticed.