|
|
#71
08-14-2005, 04:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OUT IN 23rd...
Jesus, he's getting hands left and right...
|
|
#72
08-14-2005, 11:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OUT IN 23rd...
[ QUOTE ]
Out of curiosity (and maybe I learn a thing or two) When it was your BB, why not call the all-in's extra 15k. You were getting like 4.5:1, and you can reasonably figure that it will be checked to the river if the other caller doesn't hit anything. GG though [/ QUOTE ] I'm afraid i can't remember that hand, do you have a HH?
|
|
#73
08-14-2005, 11:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OUT IN 23rd...
[ QUOTE ]
I thought it was a bit aggressive. I would need a kicker higher than the 6, or suited. With what the UTG+1 most likely has AA-55, A6 or better, KQ,KJ,KT, etc, you are about 3:1 against. If you are certain the SB would not call your raise, or reraise you, then its an OK play, but considering that risk, I would have just called. [/ QUOTE ] The thing is here that i really don't think the cards matter. 23o would be just as good. I've got 6k dead chips just waiting to be taken, plus i'm probably not more worse than 70/30 to beat UTG+1, so i have an extra bit of EV there. JJ is right about it ruining my image though, that's one aspect i didn't think about. I don't think that was the cause of BigLimper not folding his aces to my tens though.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
