|
|
|
|
#1
12-08-2005, 07:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOT rules clarification
[ QUOTE ]
Until a post can go more than 20 replies without somebody being called a whore or a [censored], I think erring on the site of not openning up people to be insulted is probably wise. [/ QUOTE ] This thread qualifies. But now that you've got the ball rolling... |
|
#2
12-08-2005, 07:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OOT rules clarification
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think it takes a really observant person to see that given the current culture of OOT, it's not exactly a place where people would want to put their personal lives on display. [/ QUOTE ]really since when? [ QUOTE ] This forum is just uniformly horrible towards women. Until a post can go more than 20 replies without somebody being called a whore or a [censored], I think erring on the site of not openning up people to be insulted is probably wise. [/ QUOTE ] true |
|
#4
12-08-2005, 07:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OOT rules clarification
I would like to clarify a few things here.
First, to answer the question that everyone wants the answer to: mslif and I are in a relationship. We have been for a little over a month now. Second, I would like to explain how this happened. It wasn't a random drunk hookup as speculated in this thread. In July mslif PMed me about a post I made in OOT and later about a post I made in SMP. I replied to these PMs and we entered into a nice dialog about various topics. We exchanged PMs every few days and at some point the conversations were interesting enough to me that I offered her my AIM screenname. We started talking over AIM regularly and clicked really well. She came on the November Vegas trip and the first afternoon she was in Vegas we met up for lunch. We clicked just as well and by the end of the weekend it was apparent that we both wanted a relationship. Third, I would like to clarify why we were shy about this topic. We wanted privacy on this topic because a certain poster has harassed her and I on the forums and via PMs both before and since the Vegas trip. The nature of the harassment that she received was intense and she didn't want to have to deal with more of it from him nor anyone else. OOT is not kind to women. Lastly, I did not request nor did I approve of El Diablo being banned. I requested through Dids and Evan that his ban be reversed as soon as I heard about it. |
|
#7
12-08-2005, 07:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OOT rules clarification
[ QUOTE ]
We wanted privacy on this topic because a certain poster has harassed her and I on the forums and via PMs both before and since the Vegas trip. [/ QUOTE ] "...a certain poster has harassed her and me..." |
|
#8
12-08-2005, 08:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OOT rules clarification
Man, we did not need this gimmick account. We already have a forum half full of them. The other half is people who don't care and are always getting corrected by the damn dirty nits.
|
|
#9
12-08-2005, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OOT rules clarification
[ QUOTE ]
Man, we did not need this gimmick account. We already have a forum half full of them. The other half is people who don't care and are always getting corrected by the damn dirty nits. [/ QUOTE ] You beat me to the punch. Worstest gimmmmickckck ackount evre. |
|
#10
12-08-2005, 08:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OOT rules clarification
[ QUOTE ]
Third, I would like to clarify why we were shy about this topic. We wanted privacy on this topic because a certain poster has harassed her and I on the forums and via PMs both before and since the Vegas trip. The nature of the harassment that she received was intense and she didn't want to have to deal with more of it from him nor anyone else. OOT is not kind to women. [/ QUOTE ] Has he been IP banned yet? Not that it's exactly difficult to circumvent. (I'm assuming that the poster in question is the most obvious suspect) |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
