Bonds asterisk

[ThaSaltCracka]

yeah, 1994 was for only 114 games.

Montreal was continually in the bottom 5 for attendance in the NL. 1994 could have been different if they had kept on winning. If that team had reached the playoffs, there is literally no telling what could have happened to that franchise.

Case in point, the M's, which use to be the laughing stock of the AL. After 1995(their first year ever in the playoffs) their attendence skyrocketed. Seattle has never been lower than 5th in AL attendence since 1995.

FYI, Montreal never made the playoffs in during their 35 year run.

[jesusarenque]

FYI, Montreal never made the playoffs in during their 35 year run.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYI, Montreal made the playoffs in 1981. They lost in the NLCS to the Dodgers 3-2.

[ThaSaltCracka]

oh my bad, but yet another strike shortened season. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[jesusarenque]

The strike giveth, the strike taketh away.

[ThaSaltCracka]

what a weird season anyway. How did they come up with the whole first half and the second half?

To be honest with you, I had never noticed that they had made the playoffs before, I even looked once before [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]

[jesusarenque]

I remembered because I am a Dodger fan. They went on to win the World Series that year.

[andyfox]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[ThaSaltCracka]

thought you guys might like this. His "growth" looks pretty normal when you take every year into account.

[Homer]

[ QUOTE ]
thought you guys might like this. His "growth" looks pretty normal when you take every year into account.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you click on 1998, then 2000 it looks like a pretty dramatic change.

[ThaSaltCracka]

its hard to get a good look at his face and overall body in the 2000 photo. But I sort of agree, but it isn't that dramatic.