Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2005, 08:35 AM
SinCityGuy SinCityGuy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 362
Default Re: What do you consider for someone to call themsevles PRO/SEMI-PRO/E

[ QUOTE ]
Personally I would say that one have to make about 10K$/month in order to:
1. Have a decent living. 3K for house, car, schools for kids etc.
2. 3K for pension savings etc. I donīt want to live on the street when I retire.
3. 3K to build my bankroll.

Anything below this is not a life in my view.

[/ QUOTE ]

Very interesting.

Using that logic, about 85% of Americans are living in poverty.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2005, 09:23 AM
csg csg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5
Default Re: What do you consider for someone to call themsevles PRO/SEMI-PRO/E

So you think 36K$ per year to provide for the family is a lot???!!!

First you have to separate the issues here.

Providing for the family if one has such is the very bottom line that one has to make playing every month. Then we have the pension savings for about 3K per month. I can accept that this could be on the very top, but as you donīt know how long you can work as a professional poker player I think its right to stash away as much as possible in the beginning of the career, say the first 2-4 years.

Regarding the bankroll. I strongly belive that one should regard the poker as a business and every business needs to make profit inorder to be able to invest in future business. But if you are confortable playing 1/2$ NL online and never stepping up its fine. However I think that if I ever was to try to go pro I would like to build my self a bankroll so that I could play on levels very I could make a decent profit every month and maybe not have to put in so many grinding hours as I have to do on lower level.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2005, 11:31 AM
ianlippert ianlippert is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 88
Default Re: What do you consider for someone to call themsevles PRO/SEMI-PRO/E

[ QUOTE ]
So you think 36K$ per year to provide for the family is a lot???!!!


[/ QUOTE ]

I'd say it really depends on where you live. My parents combined income is $70K Canadian (probably $50K US) and we live a very comfortable middle class life style. Also if you are married $35K would be in addition to whatever your wife makes. I think anyone that has problems supporting a family on $50K/yr should really take a look at their lifestyle.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-05-2005, 01:27 AM
SinCityGuy SinCityGuy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 362
Default Re: What do you consider for someone to call themsevles PRO/SEMI-PRO/E

[ QUOTE ]
So you think 36K$ per year to provide for the family is a lot???!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

I was referring to your figure of $10K of income per month. That's not great wealth by any means, but it's more than 85% of the people in this country make.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-04-2005, 12:52 PM
Jesse Kidd Jesse Kidd is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8
Default Re: What do you consider for someone to call themsevles PRO/SEMI-PRO/E

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
if you live off your poker earnings and have no other income youre a pro.

if you have multiple lines of income and poker is a significant portion of it you are semipro.



[/ QUOTE ]

I tried to address the same question on our Swedish forum a couple of month ago and got the same stupid answers as the one above.

It has irritated me that any one can be refered to as a PokerPro without any distinction on how much the are actually making playing poker.

What I think both Red Rain and I is asking for, Is at what level can one be considered to be taken as a serious PokerPro. i.e. not living out of mom.

Personally I would say that one have to make about 10K$/month in order to:
1. Have a decent living. 3K for house, car, schools for kids etc.
2. 3K for pension savings etc. I donīt want to live on the street when I retire.
3. 3K to build my bankroll.

Anything below this is not a life in my view.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ugh. No offense to the poster above, but...wow. The arrogance of that last sentence makes me cringe.

I've derived my income from poker for 2 years now, and I don't think the amount I make defines my job one bit.

Jesse
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-04-2005, 01:06 PM
MicroBob MicroBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: memphis
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: What do you consider for someone to call themsevles PRO/SEMI-PRO/E

[ QUOTE ]


Anything below this is not a life in my view.

[/ QUOTE ]



so most school-teachers and nurses in this country are not living 'a life'.


We're not talking minimum-wage here and that someone should be able to survive on $6/hr from McDonalds or Wal-Mart or as a janitor.

We're talking 'real' professions (as it were) where the typical salary is $50k or less....and we have people saying "it's not a life" or "I can't see how anyone can really survive on less" and things like that.


I think that if you use $100k/yr as a cut-off we are probably looking at less than 10% of the world's population...and I suspect less than 5%.


I've never made $100k in a year before.
I'm 34 years-old.
I don't believe I fall into the category of 'no life'.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-04-2005, 02:55 PM
csg csg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5
Default Re: What do you consider for someone to call themsevles PRO/SEMI-PRO/E

And those real professions are putting their salaries on stake every day?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-04-2005, 03:05 PM
flair1239 flair1239 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 343
Default Re: What do you consider for someone to call themsevles PRO/SEMI-PRO/E

Does anyone else think the OP is dickish for challenging people to HU matches at Bars and Parties? Is this common behavior... just seems really dumb to me.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-04-2005, 03:35 PM
RED_RAIN RED_RAIN is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 11
Default Re: What do you consider for someone to call themsevles PRO/SEMI-PRO/E

Umm, actually I only take people up when they ask, I don't go around asking others unless I think they would be interested. And yes, from what I see, it's common behavior. There is no reason for me to ask since no one will buck up and take it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-04-2005, 05:03 PM
Aytumious Aytumious is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 313
Default Re: What do you consider for someone to call themsevles PRO/SEMI-PRO/E

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
if you live off your poker earnings and have no other income youre a pro.

if you have multiple lines of income and poker is a significant portion of it you are semipro.



[/ QUOTE ]

I tried to address the same question on our Swedish forum a couple of month ago and got the same stupid answers as the one above.

It has irritated me that any one can be refered to as a PokerPro without any distinction on how much the are actually making playing poker.

What I think both Red Rain and I is asking for, Is at what level can one be considered to be taken as a serious PokerPro. i.e. not living out of mom.

Personally I would say that one have to make about 10K$/month in order to:
1. Have a decent living. 3K for house, car, schools for kids etc.
2. 3K for pension savings etc. I donīt want to live on the street when I retire.
3. 3K to build my bankroll.

Anything below this is not a life in my view.

[/ QUOTE ]

You need to add a few K to cover the surgery that allows you to suck your own cock.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.