Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 06-10-2005, 09:45 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: I limp-reraise.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You dont think 99, KJ, AT ever fold here?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think that someone who raises 7% of time preflop will have three-bet an UTG raiser from MP with KJ or AT.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't raise UTG the first time around and he didn't 3-bet. It's already been covered why I didn't raise the first time around, and it's a pretty close decision IMHO (normally I raise here).

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 06-10-2005, 11:25 AM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: I limp-reraise.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You dont think 99, KJ, AT ever fold here?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think that someone who raises 7% of time preflop will have three-bet an UTG raiser from MP with KJ or AT.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't raise UTG the first time around and he didn't 3-bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

I blanked on that when responding. However, I don't know how often a 7% PF raiser is even raising from MP vs. one limper with "only" AT or KJ.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 06-10-2005, 02:19 PM
Trix Trix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,568
Default Re: I limp-reraise.

tbh, I think it will be hard for you to get him to fold big cards on most boards as he will either have runner runner gutshot or overcards.

[ QUOTE ]
Additionally, it's going to (in general) increase my ability to play correctly postflop and hopefully increase his tendencies to make bad folds. But I don't know about that one.


[/ QUOTE ]

I like I said in the other post, I dont think it will increase your edge postflop, you have fewer options when you play it like that, so putting money in while probably behind and out of position against a player who can play fast without having you beat will lead to tough decisions on boards where you could just have check-folded.

You may get lucky and get him to fold something like QQ on a AKx board, but if thatīs what you want, then check-raising the flop will probably give the same result :P

Someone really should do a pokerstove, but I dont think you are ahead of his range and having him to make a fold on the turn with 6 outs getting 7:1 isnīt something I would limit my options for.

If I just call, I can choose which boards we go 2 bets on before the turn(check-raising), so that will pretty much be the same as doing the limp-reraise, except that I will only choose boards I like.

You can also check-call the flop, then check-raise the turn when the board is good, thatīs probably also better than having him make a close to correct laydown the other way.

You can also check-call till river and then have him make a bad call.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 06-10-2005, 05:30 PM
tizim tizim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 39
Default Re: I limp-reraise.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If Villain has shown the propensity to fold postflop, I think this is excellent. At least, it would work beautifully against me. I would probably fold AK for 1 small bet on any flop unimproved after getting limp-reraised by most players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Getting 6.5:1, in position, i'd be tempted to raise/peel on just about any flop with AK/AQ and possibly AJ (and many times with KQ). It is true that there are probably a lot of flops i'd consider folding JJ-99 on, though.

-d

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think 6.5:1 is enough to peel against most sane limp-reraisers with overcards only. 6.5:1 is about what you need if both your overcards are going to win 100% of the time. Against a limp-reraise, especially by someone first-in, the likelyhood of his having AA/KK is so likely that your outs are severely discounted. You're not getting enough pot odds, not to mention, you're facing huge reverse implied odds, so I think the flop is a fold.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 06-10-2005, 05:56 PM
SoSo SoSo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Outer Space..
Posts: 97
Default Re: I limp-reraise.

I think this play is totally unnesecary in a 2/4 10 way game....However

i think your gonna run into a scared AQ or KQs quite a lot of the time so be prepared to chuck it after you havent improved on the turn if he raises ur flop bet.

Your gonna gain an extra 1sb against a large % of his hands he will be opening from mp gathering from his stats.

so yeah its a good play, just not really nessecary, take it too the 5/10 6max when you get there.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 06-10-2005, 06:06 PM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: I limp-reraise.

[ QUOTE ]
take it too the 5/10 6max when you get there.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm already there. Just playing 2/4 as a fun break. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

But I never LRR in 6max games -- I'm sure there will be a situation eventually where it'll be a good idea, but I haven't come across it yet.

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 06-10-2005, 06:11 PM
SoSo SoSo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Outer Space..
Posts: 97
Default Re: I limp-reraise.

yeah i was discussing LRR with a friend. He reckowns the 10/20 games it starts to become apropriate to start LRR the big pairs, as deception starts playing a much larger part in the hgher stakes games.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.