|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Percentile | |||
| top 10% |
   
|
128 | 47.23% |
| 10-20% |
  
|
49 | 18.08% |
| 20-30% |
  
|
19 | 7.01% |
| 30-40% |
  
|
15 | 5.54% |
| 40-50% |
  
|
14 | 5.17% |
| 50-60% |
  
|
7 | 2.58% |
| 60-70% |
|
3 | 1.11% |
| 70-80% |
|
3 | 1.11% |
| 80-90% |
|
8 | 2.95% |
| 90-100% |
|
25 | 9.23% |
| Voters: 271. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#61
05-27-2005, 10:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is JoshuaD a nerd, yes or no. EVIDENCE INCLUDED.
[ QUOTE ]
Oh, sorry to offend those of us who worship young boys. My bad. [/ QUOTE ] Also... are you so retarded as to assume: I dont want to see pictures of guys who work out sans shirt to mean: I am attracted to young boys? WOW. IF that is you (and I think we all have our doubts) put down the weights because you are so dumb you might forget to breathe. 
|
|
#63
05-27-2005, 10:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is JoshuaD a nerd, yes or no. EVIDENCE INCLUDED.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Oh, sorry to offend those of us who worship young boys. My bad. [/ QUOTE ] I like girls. [/ QUOTE ] They don't like you.
|
|
#64
05-27-2005, 10:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is JoshuaD a nerd, yes or no. EVIDENCE INCLUDED.
This idea is already taken.
|
|
#65
05-27-2005, 10:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is JoshuaD a nerd, yes or no. EVIDENCE INCLUDED.
Wow, 2 gimmick account haters.
Im big timin' it.
|
|
#66
05-27-2005, 10:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is JoshuaD a nerd, yes or no. EVIDENCE INCLUDED.
[ QUOTE ]
This idea is already taken. [/ QUOTE ] This one will be better executed.
|
|
#67
05-27-2005, 10:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is JoshuaD a nerd, yes or no. EVIDENCE INCLUDED.
jason_t: computers: possible because of caluclus or natural selection?
jason_t: electricity: understood and harnassed because of caluclus or natural selection? jason_t: major engineering projects: (hoover dam, atomic bomb, etc.) possible because of caluclus or natural selection? jason_t: i could go on, but i've already won CallMeIshmael: wow CallMeIshmael: no CallMeIshmael: ok CallMeIshmael: what CallMeIshmael: factor causes CallMeIshmael: teh most war in the world? CallMeIshmael: religion CallMeIshmael: yes? jason_t: yes CallMeIshmael: to the agnostic/atheist CallMeIshmael: relgion CallMeIshmael: is looked upon CallMeIshmael: as a means for explanaiton CallMeIshmael: for man's origins CallMeIshmael: yes? CallMeIshmael: (or a way to appease the weak) jason_t: sure CallMeIshmael: there is not one person who existed CallMeIshmael: that has had CallMeIshmael: more of an influene CallMeIshmael: on teh downfall of relgion CallMeIshmael: than darwion jason_t: i don't understand your point CallMeIshmael: i believe darwin to have had more influnce CallMeIshmael: on the structure of modern sociery jason_t: (sorry, was watching varitek bat) CallMeIshmael: ive got it on too jason_t: 2 run hr! CallMeIshmael: indeed jason_t: but newton has had more of an effect on the quality of our lives jason_t: and our day to day life CallMeIshmael: i can agree with that CallMeIshmael: i was more CallMeIshmael: or my original idea CallMeIshmael: ws more CallMeIshmael: that in terms of intelligence CallMeIshmael: darwin pwns all but shakespeare jason_t: no, that's [censored] absurd jason_t: you're embarassing yourself now CallMeIshmael: taht is SOO youre bias jason_t: how can you say that shakespeare is more intelligent than jason_t: archimedes jason_t: newton jason_t: gauss jason_t: euler jason_t: einstein jason_t: darwin jason_t: fenymann jason_t: russell CallMeIshmael: you are unfairly biasing yourself CallMeIshmael: towards mathematicians CallMeIshmael: shakespeare had an uncanny understanding of the human mind CallMeIshmael: word play CallMeIshmael: plot developement CallMeIshmael: irony jason_t: keynes CallMeIshmael: keep naming people, please jason_t: marx CallMeIshmael: ewwww CallMeIshmael: thats a good one jason_t: these people thought about and solved some of the deepest problems ever and came up with highly unique ideas jason_t: jeter CallMeIshmael: triple jason_t: yeah [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] CallMeIshmael: there is a reasin CallMeIshmael: that there is debate CallMeIshmael: shakespeare didnt exist jason_t: Adam Smith CallMeIshmael: dude CallMeIshmael: will s CallMeIshmael: held teh soul of mankind in his hand jason_t: good friend says: "he should stfu" CallMeIshmael: you are unfairly biasing yourself against the storytellers of the world CallMeIshmael: the way CallMeIshmael: shakespeare could put a work together CallMeIshmael: was amazing jason_t: i honestly don't think that it requires as much as intelligence as thinking about difficult problems in math/physics/economics/philosophy CallMeIshmael: i think that is a very clear bias CallMeIshmael: imo CallMeIshmael: im willing to accept CallMeIshmael: that since i cant jason_t: dude, [censored] bach is more intelligent than shakespeare CallMeIshmael: absolutely not true CallMeIshmael: it is WAYY harder CallMeIshmael: to compose what shakeasre did CallMeIshmael: that what bach did jason_t: omfg jason_t: he wrotes stories! jason_t: [censored] stories! CallMeIshmael: no CallMeIshmael: well CallMeIshmael: yes CallMeIshmael: but CallMeIshmael: its not like he just wrote stories jason_t: great, so he sat around, thought about some things that happened in history jason_t: turned them into stories jason_t: thought about some things like romance etc. that happen to people jason_t: and made them into stories jason_t: big [censored] deal jason_t: these other people invented things that didn't exist before them! CallMeIshmael: arod gets hit CallMeIshmael: and CallMeIshmael: even he knows CallMeIshmael: shakepeare was brilliant jason_t: look, the following equation is true jason_t: and it's not close jason_t: principia > hamlet jason_t: origin of species > hamlet CallMeIshmael: in terms of ingenuity required? CallMeIshmael: though CallMeIshmael: i agee with both CallMeIshmael: they are close CallMeIshmael: but CallMeIshmael: ws did that greatly CallMeIshmael: multiple times jason_t: the calculus > iambic [censored] pentameter
|
|
#68
05-27-2005, 10:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is JoshuaD a nerd, yes or no. EVIDENCE INCLUDED.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Oh, sorry to offend those of us who worship young boys. My bad. [/ QUOTE ] Also... are you so retarded as to assume: I dont want to see pictures of guys who work out sans shirt to mean: I am attracted to young boys? WOW. IF that is you (and I think we all have our doubts) put down the weights because you are so dumb you might forget to breathe. [/ QUOTE ] He was referring to me, I believe. From what I posted in the "Your Threesome" thread, he correctly assumed that I like young boys. And by young, I mean 17-20. I just turned 20. I don't see anything shameful or wrong about that.
|
|
#69
05-27-2005, 11:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is JoshuaD a nerd, yes or no. EVIDENCE INCLUDED.
[ QUOTE ]
CallMeIshmael: that what bach did [/ QUOTE ] I didn't realize that I was accepted as a genius already [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
|
#70
05-27-2005, 11:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is JoshuaD a nerd, yes or no. EVIDENCE INCLUDED.
[ QUOTE ]
Also... are you so retarded as to assume: I dont want to see pictures of guys who work out sans shirt to mean: I am attracted to young boys? [/ QUOTE ] WTF? I replied to JackWilson, who is openly gay and made an entry in the threesome thread that made it clear he likes them young. VERY young. I don't see why you responded to this post. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] Edited to add: see, Jack confirmed this just above. Not that I have anything against Jack, that's his prerogative, whatever.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
