Interesting HU 100-200 hand

[sublime]

FWIW, in a lot of these games, it is very tough to discuss the hands intelligently without knowing who the opponents are.

cool, i can accept that. i am sure you understand where i am coming from though.

[sublime]

Shawn, ignore subline he is stupid and wrong.

stupid? stupid like cutting a deal with an opponent at a final table and taking the worst of it by a large margin? or stupid like eating house pets in foreign countries?

[daryn]

BA-ZING

[sublime]

cool, i can accept that. i am sure you understand where i am coming from though.

the more i think about it, the more i think that player names are not needed and it violates an unwritten "rule" of 2+2. i mean hundereds of posters take the time to write out "player is tight and can get out of line postflop" etc. yet shawn posts hand historys (unedited) from a game that almost NONE of us play, and it is "needed" to judge his play? nope, i still think it is rude. what gives shawn the right to post how thegrinder (or whatever his name is) plays a certain hand on a public forum, when none of us have earned that info?

[stinkypete]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So, they're you are.

[/ QUOTE ]
...
[ QUOTE ]
That lesson is free. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
And rightfully so.

[/ QUOTE ]

hehe. pure gold.

[sublime]

bump for bruiser

[Benjamin]

[ QUOTE ]
the more i think about it, the more i think that player names are not needed and it violates an unwritten "rule" of 2+2. i mean hundereds of posters take the time to write out "player is tight and can get out of line postflop" etc. yet shawn posts hand historys (unedited) from a game that almost NONE of us play, and it is "needed" to judge his play? nope, i still think it is rude. what gives shawn the right to post how thegrinder (or whatever his name is) plays a certain hand on a public forum, when none of us have earned that info?

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with this. Good points.

B.