#61
|
|||
|
|||
Re: True viability of multi-tabling?
You think astroglide is a "true genius"? Boy oh boy.
-James |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Re: True viability of multi-tabling?
Not necessarily.
Was trying to say that most 2+2'ers don't consider THEMSELVES to be geniuses....except for astro. Something like that anyway. Stupid joke. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Re: True viability of multi-tabling?
IMHO you should skip the gametime windows and go to playerview bob. Ive been playing with it for a week and it is an incredable tool and entirely automatic.
Steve |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Re: True viability of multi-tabling?
That makes more sense. I get it now. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
-James |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Re: True viability of multi-tabling?
Yeah....I do need to get the playerview thing and keep meaning to set it up.
I would still run the game-time window though....helpful for keeping track of unseen players at your table and how they're playing. as was the original point of this thread, when one is multi-tabling you can't always keep track. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Re: True viability of multi-tabling?
hmmm, not sure what you mean by unseen player, but playerview auto updates everytime pokertracker does, so the stats are there real time
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Re: True viability of multi-tabling?
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Re: True viability of multi-tabling?
I play two tables at once, tracking each in real-time using PO. At 1600 x 1200 resolution, it is perfect. Works an absolute treat for me - rare that I lose on both tables in any one session.
I've tried 3 or 4 tables at once but agree that you lose part of your edge - a part I found I really missed. Dave/MEL. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Re: True viability of multi-tabling?
[ QUOTE ]
I don't believe that anyone is able to avg. 2bb per 100 at 8 tables. It's hard enough at 1 table. And, if they are doing it, it's a streak that will not last in my opinion. I can't imagine being able to truly win 2 BB/100 on 8 tables. [/ QUOTE ] I use to play between 4 and 8 (average = 6). My avg is 2.29BB/100, but maybe I dont have enough hands (about 50,000) David |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Re: True viability of multi-tabling?
Thanks for the link.
I douwnloaded it and the net1 what-cha-ma-thing. And now it looks like the site (that you linked me to) is broken and I have no idea what to input in for valid-database. I also was reading the 'probs with playerview' thread in the books-software forum and it looks like there are still quite a few bugs with this thing. And it definitely looks WAY more complicated than I might be able to figure out since I am a total moron on computers. I think I can get it eventually though...and hopefully it doesn't cause probs to my computer. |
|
|