|
|
#62
11-17-2005, 02:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Agree/Disagree
[ QUOTE ]
I know you didn't really ask for our advice, but doesn't it strike you a little odd that not a single person who has responded to this thread agrees with you? Everyone thinks their strategy is a good one, but what separates the good players from the bad ones is the ability to accept criticism and alter your play and learn from it. Keeping that in mind, I recommend re-reading the posts in this thread, reading a lot of other threads in this forum, and come to your own conclusion. [/ QUOTE ] I appreciate the civility, instead of just calling me a moron. Now, if you'll read the original quote, which spawned the 2nd and thrid quotes after discussion, I believe the OBJECTIVE is to not have to put your chips at risk without knowing you have the best hand. Do I always follow this straegy? Of course not, but I believe it to be the key to my success thus far. Am I still growing as a player? Of course, and I will certainly take into consideration the posts on this topic, thanks for your responses. |
|
#63
11-17-2005, 02:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Agree/Disagree
My opinions:
[ QUOTE ] "the key in sng's is to never have to go all in. every person who is serious about sng's will tell you that" [/ QUOTE ] We are quite serious here and most of us disagree with the statement. [ QUOTE ] "you can play hard with out putting all of your chips at risk" [/ QUOTE ] Impossible in poker tournaments of any kind, deep stack or otherwise, never mind STTs. [ QUOTE ] "you should NEVER have to go all in without the nuts before the blinds get to 100/200 unless you are desperately short stacked" [/ QUOTE ] I guess it depends on what he considers "desperately short stacked" when the BB is t200. I still think this is probably wrong anyway because in poker NEVER is almost never correct. |
|
#64
11-17-2005, 02:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Agree/Disagree
[ QUOTE ]
However, i believe strongly that the GOAL of sng's is to not have to put all of your chips at risk without what you believe is the best hand by a wide margin, whether it is the absolute nuts, or 2nd or 3rd nuts. [/ QUOTE ] you can keep saying this until you're blue in the face, but you'll be just as wrong as you were the first time... |
|
#66
11-17-2005, 02:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Agree/Disagree
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] However, i believe strongly that the GOAL of sng's is to not have to put all of your chips at risk without what you believe is the best hand by a wide margin, whether it is the absolute nuts, or 2nd or 3rd nuts. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, i keep hearing that, but no one is telling me why going all in without knowing you are winning is, in fact, a winning strategy. you can keep saying this until you're blue in the face, but you'll be just as wrong as you were the first time... [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#67
11-17-2005, 02:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Agree/Disagree
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] However, i believe strongly that the GOAL of sng's is to not have to put all of your chips at risk without what you believe is the best hand by a wide margin, whether it is the absolute nuts, or 2nd or 3rd nuts. [/ QUOTE ] you can keep saying this until you're blue in the face, but you'll be just as wrong as you were the first time... yeah, i keep hearing that, but no one is telling me why going all in without knowing you are winning is, in fact, a winning strategy. [/ QUOTE ] you can keep saying this until you're blue in the face, but you'll be just as wrong as you were the first time... |
|
#69
11-17-2005, 02:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Agree/Disagree
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] However, i believe strongly that the GOAL of sng's is to not have to put all of your chips at risk without what you believe is the best hand by a wide margin, whether it is the absolute nuts, or 2nd or 3rd nuts. [/ QUOTE ] you can keep saying this until you're blue in the face, but you'll be just as wrong as you were the first time... [/ QUOTE ] you can keep saying this until you're blue in the face, but you'll be just as wrong as you were the first time... [/ QUOTE ] |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
