Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: What is Hero's action?
Limp 9 11.84%
Fold 50 65.79%
Raise 17 22.37%
Voters: 76. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 03-28-2005, 02:45 PM
Degen Degen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Re-stealing
Posts: 1,064
Default Re: OK, let\'s turn to the math....

lol i consider myself strong in math but that went way over my head...it is definately not a fold...its either a call or a push...i think calling is a horrible move but it can be argued for.

one thing is for certain, there is more than one right way to play these tourneys and win. i'm sure somebody could call that all the time and somebody else could push it all the time...and they both could win.


i'm done with this one...see you in another thread [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]


Degen
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 03-28-2005, 02:50 PM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default Re: OK, let\'s turn to the math....

[ QUOTE ]
lol i consider myself strong in math but that went way over my head...

[/ QUOTE ]

So you don't think that Prize Strucutre Analysis ($EV) is the math the works best for making decisions? You're just going to shoot from the hip? If shooting from the hip is your style of play and subsequent advice, I'd begin to caution you on being so adamant in your opinions on this forum.

[ QUOTE ]
i'm done with this one...see you in another thread

[/ QUOTE ]

Man, even I can admit when I'm wrong...
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 03-28-2005, 03:00 PM
Degen Degen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Re-stealing
Posts: 1,064
Default Re: OK, let\'s turn to the math....

"So you don't think that Prize Strucutre Analysis ($EV) is the math the works best for making decisions?"

I'm sure its a good tool. I've not gotten too far into it yet, when i decide to take the next step (55's, 109's etc) i'll add this tool to my game i'm sure.


though i must say, i like guys like you at my table. nobody is easier to steal blinds from that a bean counter with his ICM open.


Degen
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 03-28-2005, 03:37 PM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default Re: OK, let\'s turn to the math....

[ QUOTE ]
though i must say, i like guys like you at my table. nobody is easier to steal blinds from that a bean counter with his ICM open.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, you don't get it.

In return then, I like guys like you, who choose not to learn the game, including the math part, and make bad decisions. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Scuba
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 03-28-2005, 03:42 PM
adanthar adanthar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 27
Default Re: $30+3 - Very difficult bubble hand

My gut says this is a push but it may be a call - I think I would go by how likely BB is to overcall if I call (if he folds every time, I'd be more likely to push.) This, however, is because with 3200 chips I'm more likely to take first than the ICM says.

I would never fold here.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 03-28-2005, 04:47 PM
fnord_too fnord_too is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 672
Default Re: OK, let\'s turn to the math....

[ QUOTE ]

Hand range is something like AJ+, 77+, KQs when he calls.
AKo is a 49% dog to the hand range above


[/ QUOTE ]

I get

[ QUOTE ]
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

133,559,712 games 0.219 secs 609,861,698 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) / tie (%)

Hand 1: 52.6631 % [ 00.46 00.06 ] { AcKd }
Hand 2: 47.3369 % [ 00.41 00.06 ] { AA-77, AKs-AJs, KQs, AKo-AJo }


[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't check any of the other math (since this was easy to check and I'm lazy). I don't think I buy your assumptions. I'm not saying I am correct, but I have not been convinced that I am incorrect.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 03-28-2005, 04:52 PM
utmt40 utmt40 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cookeville Tennessee
Posts: 483
Default Re: $30+3 - Very difficult bubble hand

Just say "Not enough, I'm all-in!"
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 03-28-2005, 05:00 PM
pooh74 pooh74 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 316
Default Re: $30+3 - Very difficult bubble hand

dunno if this has been mentioned...but
1. call- then If BB comes along, push/call flop regardless

2. call- if BB folds, play the hand like your life is on the line...fold to bet on missed flop/check down...play weak IOW(800 left if you fold...great shape to squeak itm)

This is how 'd i play it...i think by only asking "what would you do" leaves out the branches in the analysis of "call, then what would you do if, 1. and 2."
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 03-28-2005, 05:32 PM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default Re: OK, let\'s turn to the math....

[ QUOTE ]
but I have not been convinced that I am incorrect.


[/ QUOTE ]

No it looks like you're correct. I reran this through pokerstove, and I cannot for the life of me figure out why I came out with different numbers...

Edit: just figured it out, I forgot to include AJ in the hand range.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 03-28-2005, 05:32 PM
valenzuela valenzuela is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 453
Default Re: $30+3 - Very difficult bubble hand

A different point of view does UTG wants to call..lets see this from his point fo view if the math tells us its wrong for him to call then pushing its the best move.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.