#61
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Biggest winner/s at Party Limit Holdem?
[ QUOTE ]
GentlemanGerry, Weren't you the guy who was caught changing a hand history from 15/30 to 50/100. Shouldn't you be too embarassed to make these trolling posts? [/ QUOTE ] he should be embarassed to make these posts. but the change was a bit less drastic (he changed a 15/30 hand history to 30/60 so he could post it here). he should also be embarassed b/c his IP is the same as our other beloved posters cinnaminwind et.al. (et.al. = i can't remember, not i know and am not telling...it was posted in general) ... the reason he should be embarassed results from the ambiguity between troll and wannabe poster. anyways, why bump this? Barron |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Biggest winner/s at Party Limit Holdem?
[ QUOTE ]
anyways, why bump this? Barron [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, that was me bumping. I din't think the data was worth a new thread, it kinda fitted here, and I thought some people might be interested....... |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Biggest winner/s at Party Limit Holdem?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] GentlemanGerry, Weren't you the guy who was caught changing a hand history from 15/30 to 50/100. Shouldn't you be too embarassed to make these trolling posts? [/ QUOTE ] he should be embarassed to make these posts. but the change was a bit less drastic (he changed a 15/30 hand history to 30/60 so he could post it here). he should also be embarassed b/c his IP is the same as our other beloved posters cinnaminwind et.al. (et.al. = i can't remember, not i know and am not telling...it was posted in general) ... the reason he should be embarassed results from the ambiguity between troll and wannabe poster. anyways, why bump this? Barron [/ QUOTE ] WHOAH! This is the first time this has been revealed. I miss the matador. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Biggest winner/s at Party Limit Holdem?
Too late to edit my post, but someone just pointed out that one of the lines got screwed up when formatting, and should actually read:
monkey38 47543 841.38 1.77 |
|
|