|
|
#62
08-19-2005, 11:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Could I be a losing player at $200nl 6-max?
[ QUOTE ]
what is loosen up to you? you can do great in 200 nl 6m with 20 10 stats. [/ QUOTE ] you can do better with 30/15 
|
|
#63
08-20-2005, 12:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Could I be a losing player at $200nl 6-max?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] what is loosen up to you? you can do great in 200 nl 6m with 20 10 stats. [/ QUOTE ] you can do better with 30/15 [/ QUOTE ] couple questions... sure you can make g's playing 30 15, but is it really a good idea to recommend it to someone struggling? deep end of the pool etc.
|
|
#64
08-20-2005, 12:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Could I be a losing player at $200nl 6-max?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] what is loosen up to you? you can do great in 200 nl 6m with 20 10 stats. [/ QUOTE ] you can do better with 30/15 [/ QUOTE ] couple questions... sure you can make g's playing 30 15, but is it really a good idea to recommend it to someone struggling? deep end of the pool etc. [/ QUOTE ] you're right
|
|
#65
08-20-2005, 12:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Could I be a losing player at $200nl 6-max?
His numbers for 6max remind me of my full ring numbers before I quit that. Maybe I'm a loose bastard but I just can't imagine playing that tight.
I play 35-40% of my hands, but I think 25% would be fine for spongy. PS I am talking out of my ass and know ver ylittle about stats, poker tracker, etc. The main thing is that he looks very tight and I kind of inferred weak tight which would be disastrous for 6max.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
