Re: Separation of church and state
TO say that I am not damaged is idiotic.
A religious guy seeing an image of Christ having Sex with a goat could claim damage and it is valid.
Whether the damage has redress in a court is a different issue. I was asked to show damage, and in fact the poster even offered to reconsider his position if i showed it. Well I showed it and got a shouting with filthy ungodlike language. I showed the damage, I offered the reasons why.
So understand this -- apart from constitutional reasons (which are completely valid even though you dont accept them), the display of religious text in a government institution is offensive to some of us.
Now perhaps, you should just say [censored] you and [censored] the constitution, the TC must stay on the walls beaming down the garbage at people going to register to vote. You have that right.
|